-
Drugs w/ antiviral activity (eg, remdesivir, hydroxycholoroquine)
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: terminates viral replication by binding to RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; circumvents proofreading activity by exonucleases
- FDA MedWatch: Remdesivir by Gilead Sciences: FDA Warns of Newly Discovered Potential Drug Interaction That May Reduce Effectiveness of Treatment; see FDA alert
Emergency Use Authorization: Expanded Access/Compassionate Use - Intermediate-Size Patient Population Expanded Access Treatment Protocol for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Remdesivir (RDV; GS-5734™), NCT04302766
- Manufacturer not currently accepting new compassionate use requests; more info available at manufacturer website; Expanded Access Treatment Protocol: Remdesivir (RDV; GS-5734) for the Treatment of SARS-CoV2 (CoV) Infection, NCT04323761
Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19 – A Preliminary Report
- Multicenter, multinational, double-blind RCT; 1,063 hospitalized pts (mean age 59y, 89% severe dz) treated w/ RDV 200 mg IV x1, then 100 mg daily for up to 9 days (n=531) or placebo (n=518) for up to 10 days; all pts received supportive care per hospital SOC; other COVID-19 tx allowed per institutional protocol; median 9 days btwn sx onset and randomization; pts requiring mech vent or ECMO, RDV 23% vs placebo 28%
- Primary outcome of time to recovery: RDV 11 days vs placebo 15 days (rate ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.55); no difference in secondary outcomes of 14-day mortality, RDV 7% vs placebo 12%; no difference in ADR incidence, including incr LFTs
- Study considerations: primary outcome changed mid-study, but still incl as secondary outcome; early unblinding of preliminary results; varied protocols for other COVID-19 tx; remote monitoring; study ongoing
- Access N Engl J Med article
Remdesivir for 5 or 10 Days in Patients With Severe Covid-19 - Randomized, multicenter, multinational, open-label study: 397 hospitalized pts w/ confirmed SARS-CoV-2, pneumonia, and O2 sat ≤94% on RA or receiving supplemental O2, randomized 1:1 to receive RDV 200 mg IV x1, then 100 mg IV q24h x5 days total (n=200, median age 61y) or 10 days total (n=197, median age 62y); 10-day group sicker at baseline
- Unadjusted analysis of 14-day clinical status improvement rate: 5-day 64%, 10-day 54%, w/ no difference after adjusted analysis; ADRs incl acute resp failure (5-day 5%, 10-day 9%), resp failure (5-day 2%, 10-day 5%), grade 4 CrCl reduction (5-day 3%, 10-day 12%); elevated LFTs (5-day 2.5%, 10-day 3.6%)
- Study considerations: no placebo control; randomization not stratified; protocol amended mid-study to lower age eligibility limit; 10-day group sicker at baseline; not all pts completed full course of assigned RDV; viral load not evaluated; extension phase added to evaluate mech vent, ECMO, and multiorgan failure pts
- Access N Engl J Med article
Remdesivir in Adults With Severe COVID-19: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre Trial - Double-blind RCT; 237 pts (median age, 65y) received RDV 200 mg x1, then 100 mg daily x9 days (n=158) or placebo (n=78); incl pts w/ SaO2 <94% on RA, <12 days after sx; pts also received LPV/r (18%), IFN (19%), and steroids (38%); more RDV pts w/ late tx start (>10 days after sx) and RDV group had higher rates of HTN, DM and CAD
- Terminated early due to low enrollment and control of epidemic in China; no difference in time to clinical improvement (RDV 21 days, placebo 23 days) or 28-day mortality (RDV 14%, placebo 13%); in pts w/ ≤10 days from sx, non-significant difference in time to clinical improvement (RDV 18 days, placebo 23 days) and 28-day mortality (RDV 11%, placebo 15%)
- Viral loads decreased at similar rates in both groups; ADRs similar btwn groups (RDV 66%, placebo 64%); higher D/C rates in RDV (12%) vs placebo (5%)
- Study considerations: underpowered due to low enrollment; imbalanced baseline characteristics despite randomization; possible delay in tx start; questionable utility of subgroup analyses
- Access Lancet article
Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for Patients With Severe COVID-19 - Prospective, observational study: 53 hospitalized pts (median age, 64y) w/ O2 sat <94% on RA or receiving O2 support received RDV 200 mg IV x1 dose on day 1, then 100 mg daily x9 days (median time btwn sx and tx start, 12 days); 64% pts w/ invasive ventilation, 24% w/ minimal to no O2 support
- 68% of pts had improved O2 support category, 57% of pts w/ mech vent extubated, 13% of pts died; 60% experienced ADRs (23% serious); 23% of pts had elevated LFTs
- Study considerations: non-comparative; selection and sampling bias; no prespecified endpoints; duration of f/u shorter than planned; significant proportion had mild dz; delayed tx initiation from sx onset
- Access free N Engl J Med article
Treatment trials: Inpatient Pharmacology/Background - Proposed mechanism: inhibits viral entry and replication via intracellular alkalinization, interferes w/ maturation of viral particles through impaired glycosylation; indirect immunomodulatory effects
- Incr QT prolongation risk when used w/ AZ; monitor ECG
- FDA MedWatch: Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for COVID-19: Drug Safety Communication - FDA Cautions Against Use Outside of the Hospital Setting or a Clinical Trial Due to Risk of Heart Rhythm Problems; see FDA alert
Emergency Use Authorization revoked June 15, 2020: Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 - Observational cohort study w/ propensity score matching; 1,376 consecutive hospitalized pts (60% pts >60y) w/ confirmed mod-severe COVID-19; 811 pts treated w/ HCQ 600 mg bid x2, then 400 mg daily x4 days, 565 pts did not receive HCQ; 45% pts also treated w/ AZ 500 mg x1, then 250 mg daily x4 days; pts eligible for tx w/ other investigational COVID-19 tx; HCQ pts generally older, sicker, and received more concurrent tx; 86% HCQ pts received tx w/in 48h of presenting to ED
- Primary composite endpoint (intubation or death) rates higher w/ HCQ (32%) vs no HCQ (15%) in unadjusted analysis (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.84 to 3.02); adjusted analysis showed no significant association btwn HCQ use and composite endpoint (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.32)
- Study considerations: non-randomized; weighted propensity score model; treatment bias, HCQ pts were generally sicker; missing data and inaccuracies in EHR
- Access N Engl J Med article
Association of Treatment With Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin With In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York State - Retrospective multicenter cohort study; 1,438 randomly selected hospitalized pts (median age 63y) in NYC metro area w/ confirmed COVID-19 treated w/ HCQ (n=271) or AZ (n=211) alone, HCQ+AZ (n=735), or no tx (n=221); significant imbalances btwn groups, incl gender, comorbidities, and clinical severity
- Unadjusted analysis for in-hospital mortality (overall 20%), HCQ+AZ 26%, HCQ 20%, AZ 10%, no tx 13%; adjusted analysis for in-hospital mortality showed no differences when comparing pts w/ no tx to each drug group, and when comparing HCQ vs AZ
- Abnormal ECG more common in HCQ+AZ (27%) and HCQ (27%) vs AZ (16%) and no tx (14%), but no difference in adjusted analysis; more pts w/ cardiac arrest in HCQ+AZ (16%) and HCQ (14%) vs AZ (6%) and no tx (7%)
- Study considerations: retrospective, random sampling; imbalanced baseline characteristics; treatment bias; varied dosing and duration; possible missed readmissions; ADRs at any time during hospital visit, potentially prior to tx
- Access JAMA article
Hydroxychloroquine With or Without Azithromycin in Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19 - Multicenter, open-label, RCT; 667 hospitalized pts (mean age 50y) w/ mild-mod COVID-19 (58% pts required no O2) and <15 days since sx onset, randomized to receive SOC alone (n=229), SOC plus HCQ 400 mg bid x7 days (n=221), or SOC plus HCQ 400 mg bid and AZ 500 mg daily x7 days (n=217); use of CS (19.8%), other immunodulators, abx, and antivirals allowed; median time from admission to randomization 1 day, median time from sx onset to randomization 7 days
- No significant difference in clinical status at day 15 w/ HCQ vs SOC alone (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.11), or HCQ+AZ vs SOC alone (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.73); no significant difference in secondary outcomes such as intubation w/in 15 days, O2 requirement, LOS; QT prolongation more frequent in HCQ groups; elevated LFTs more frequent in HCQ+AZ group vs SOC alone
- Study considerations: randomized but open-label; pts had mild-mod. dz; primary outcome assessment changed mid-study to be more granular; observer bias
- Access N Engl J Med article
Hydroxychloroquine in Patients With Mainly Mild to Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019: An Open-label, Randomised, Controlled Trial - Multicenter, open-label, RCT; 150 hospitalized pts (mean age 46y; 99% mild or moderate dz; 63% received other antivirals) randomized 1:1 to SOC or SOC plus HCQ 1,200 daily x3 days, then 800 mg daily for total of 2-3wk based on dz severity; 17 days mean time btwn sx onset and randomization; study D/C early based on results from pre-planned interim analysis
- No difference in primary endpoint of viral clearance (85% HCQ vs 81% SOC) or secondary endpoint of sx improvement rate (60% HCQ vs 67% SOC); higher rate of ADRs in HCQ group (30% vs 9%)
- Study considerations: randomized but open-label; most pts received other potential antivirals; delayed tx initiation from sx onset; almost all pts had mild-moderate dz; higher HCQ dose and duration than other studies
- Access BMJ article
Treatment With Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Combination in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 - Retrospective, observational, multicenter study; 2,541 pts (median age 64y) w/ confirmed SARS-CoV-2 received HCQ, HCQ + AZ, AZ, or neither drug; HCQ dose: 400 mg PO bid x2 doses, then 200 mg PO bid on days 2-5; AZ dose: 500 mg PO x1, then 250 mg PO qd x4 days; adjunct CS and TCZ given in 68% and 4.5% of pts, respectively; tx driven by hospital protocol w/ QTc-interval based algorithm; HCQ-treated groups sicker (higher ICU admission rate and mech vent rate) but younger more likely to receive adjunct CS
- Crude in-hospital mortality: overall 18.1%, HCQ 13.5%, HCQ + AZ 20.1%, AZ 22.4%, neither drug 26.4%; multivariate analysis showed significant risk reduction w/ HCQ (66%) or HCQ + AZ (71%) compared w/ neither drug; additional propensity score matched analysis (n=380) showed similar results
- Study considerations: retrospective study w/ propensity score adjusted analysis; potential for selection bias based on treatment protocol and QT-interval algorithm; high rate of CS use in HCQ-treated pts; sx duration prior to admission not available; missing data and inaccuracies in EHR
- Access full-text Int J Infect Dis article
Treatment trials: Outpatient Pharmacology/Background
- Proposed mechanism: inhibits viral entry and replication via intracellular alkalinization, interferes w/ maturation of viral particles through impaired glycosylation; indirect immunomodulatory effects
- Incr QT prolongation risk when used w/ AZ; monitor ECG
- FDA MedWatch: Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for COVID-19: Drug Safety Communication - FDA Cautions Against Use Outside of the Hospital Setting or a Clinical Trial Due to Risk of Heart Rhythm Problems; see FDA alert
Emergency Use Authorization revoked Jun 15, 2020: Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults With Early COVID-19 - Double-blind, multisite RCT; 423 non-hospitalized pts (median age 40y) w/ lab-confirmed or probable COVID-19 and <5 days of sx, randomly assigned 1:1 to receive HCQ 800 mg x1, then 600 mg in 6-8h, then 600 mg daily x4 more days (n=212) or placebo (n=211); 81% had lab-confirmed infxn or epidemiologic link to a person w/ lab-confirmed infxn, 58% received SARS-CoV-2 testing; 56% enrolled w/in 1 day of sx onset; comorbid conditions incl asthma (11%), HTN (11%), DM (4%); 68% w/o comorbid conditions
- No significant difference in overall sx severity over 14 days or incidence of hospitalization between groups; higher rate of ADRs w/ HCQ (43% vs 22%)
- Study considerations: internet-based surveys in younger pts w/ mild sx; limited testing due to shortage; primary endpoint and sample size modified mid-study; study halted before secondary endpoints; medication adherence; loss to f/u
- Access Ann Intern Med article
Hydroxychloroquine for Early Treatment of Adults with Mild Covid-19: A Randomized-Controlled Trial - Multicenter, open-label, RCT; 293 non-hospitalized pts (mean age 41.6y) w/ confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infxn, mild dz, and <5 days of sx, received HCQ 800 mg PO x1, then 400 mg PO daily x6 days (n=136) or no antiviral tx (n=157); median time from sx onset to randomization 3 days; 53.2% w/ chronic health conditions; f/u 28 days
- No significant difference in mean viral load reduction at day 3 or day 7 b/w groups; no significant reduction in hospitalization or time to sx resolution b/w groups; no pts required mech vent or died during study period; no relevant tx-assoc ADRs reported
- Study considerations: randomized but open-label and not placebo-controlled; study protocol amended to remove DRV/c tx option and to incl. additional specimen collection at day 7; most pts were HCWs; self-reported compliance
- Access Clin Infect Dis article
Pharmacology/Background - Proposed mechanism: inhibits viral entry and replication via intracellular alkalinization, interferes w/ maturation of viral particles through impaired glycosylation; indirect immunomodulatory effects
- Incr QT prolongation risk when used w/ AZ; monitor ECG
- FDA MedWatch: Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for COVID-19: Drug Safety Communication - FDA Cautions Against Use Outside of the Hospital Setting or a Clinical Trial Due to Risk of Heart Rhythm Problems; see FDA alert
A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19 - Double-blinded RCT; 821 asymptomatic pts (median age 40y) w/ mod-high COVID-19 exposure risk (66.4% HCWs, 29.8% household contacts, 3.8% other occupations) given HCQ 800 mg PO x1, then 600 mg 6-8h later, then 600 mg PO daily x4 days (n=414) or placebo (n=407) w/in 4 days after exposure; adherence HCQ 75.4%, placebo 82.6%
- No difference in lab-confirmed COVID-19 incidence or COVID-19 illness w/in 14 days (HCQ 11.8%, placebo 14.3%); 1 hospitalization per group, no deaths or arrhythmias; ADRs more common w/ HCQ
- Study considerations: recruitment through social and traditional media platforms w/ enrollment via internet-based survey; f/u via email surveys, 10% didn’t complete day 14 survey; access to testing limited; sample-size adjusted mid-study; delay btwn SARS-CoV-2 exposure and HCQ start; medication adherence varied
- Access N Engl J Med article
Pharmacology/Background - Proposed mechanism: inhibits viral entry and replication via intracellular alkalinization, interferes w/ maturation of viral particles through impaired glycosylation; indirect immunomodulatory effects
- Incr QT prolongation risk when used w/ AZ; monitor ECG
- FDA MedWatch: Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for COVID-19: Drug Safety Communication - FDA Cautions Against Use Outside of the Hospital Setting or a Clinical Trial Due to Risk of Heart Rhythm Problems; see FDA alert
The QT Interval in Patients With COVID-19 Treated With Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin - Retrospective, observational study; 84 hospitalized pts (mean age, 63y) w/ confirmed SARS-CoV-2 treated w/ HCQ plus AZ; comorbidities incl CAD (11%), HTN (65%), CKD (7%), DM (20%), COPD (8%), CHF (2%); 7% on amiodarone tx
- Mean QTc interval increased from 435 msec at baseline to 463 msec; 30% pts had QTc prolonged by >40 msec; 11% pts developed QTc interval of >500 msec; no cases of torsade de pointes; acute renal failure only predictor of maximal QTc >500 msec on multivariate analysis
- Study considerations: non-comparative; small sample size; pts had other risk factors for QT prolongation besides HCQ plus AZ tx; HCQ and AZ dosing not provided
- Access Nat Med article
Other studies:
- Risk of QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Use of Hydroxychloroquine With or Without Concomitant Azithromycin Among Hospitalized Patients Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); access JAMA Cardiol article
- Assessment of QT Intervals in a Case Series of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection Treated With Hydroxychloroquine Alone or in Combination With Azithromycin in an Intensive Care Unit; access JAMA Cardiol article
Pharmacology/Background - Proposed mechanism: inhibits viral entry and replication via intracellular alkalinization, interferes w/ maturation of viral particles through impaired glycosylation; indirect immunomodulatory effects
- Incr QT prolongation risk when used w/ AZ; monitor ECG
- FDA MedWatch: Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for COVID-19: Drug Safety Communication - FDA Cautions Against Use Outside of the Hospital Setting or a Clinical Trial Due to Risk of Heart Rhythm Problems; see FDA alert
Emergency Use Authorization revoked June 15, 2020:
Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine With or Without a Macrolide for Treatment of COVID-19: A Multinational Registry Analysis - Observational multinational registry analysis; 671 hospitals on 6 continents; 96,032 hospitalized pts (mean age 53y) w/ confirmed COVID-19 treated w/ CQ (n=1,868), CQ + macrolide (n=3,783), HCQ (n=3,016), HCQ + macrolide (n=6,221) w/in 48h of dx, or no tx (n=81,144); individual propensity score analyses w/ separate control groups matched 1:1 to each tx group; 40.5% of pts received other antivirals
- Adjusted analysis for in-hospital mortality (overall 11.1%), CQ 16.4%, CQ + macrolide 22.2%, HCQ 18%, HCQ + macrolide 23.8%, no tx 9.3%; rate of de novo ventricular arrhythmias CQ 4.3%, CQ + macrolide 6.5%, HCQ 6.1%, HCQ + macrolide 8.1%, no tx 0.3%; all tx groups independently assoc w/ incr in-hospital mortality and de novo ventricular arrhythmia risks; similar results w/ each individual propensity score-matched analysis
- Study considerations: retrospective registry study; propensity score matching analysis to minimize confounders but unmeasured variables still possible; dosing and duration only provided in aggregate, dose-response analysis not done; QT intervals not measured, arrhythmia pattern not stratified; relationship btwn death and ventricular tachycardia not studied
- Access Lancet article
Effect of High vs Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial - Double-blind RCT; 81 hospitalized pts (mean age 51y; 77% w/ confirmed COVID-19 at enrollment) randomized 1:1 to high-dose CQ (600 mg bid x10 days) or low-dose CQ (450 mg bid x1 day, then 450 mg daily x4 days); all pts received AZ 500 mg daily x5 days, 90% received oseltamivir for suspected influenza infxn
- High-dose CQ group halted early due to safety concerns and all pts converted to low-dose CQ; small sample size in low-dose CQ group limits efficacy analysis, but resp secretions negative at day 4 in 6 of 27 tested pts
- 27% pts died (39% w/ high-dose CQ, 15% w/ low-dose CQ); 15% pts developed QTc interval >500 msec (19% w/ high-dose CQ, 11% w/ low-dose CQ), 2 pts had ventricular tachycardia w/ 2 deaths
- Study considerations: small sample size; interim safety data, limited efficacy analysis; high-dose CQ arm had older pts w/ more comorbidities; no contemporaneous control group
- Access JAMA Netw Open article
Preliminary Evidence From a Multicenter Prospective Observational Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Chloroquine for the Treatment of COVID-19 - Multicenter prospective observational study; 197 hospitalized pts (mean age 44y, 91% moderate dz) w/ confirmed SARS-CoV-2 received CQ (500 mg qd or bid for up to 10 days); 176 historical controls (mean age 46y) received other antiviral tx; time btwn sx onset and tx start longer in CQ by 4 days
- Primary endpoint of time to viral suppression shorter w/ CQ (difference, 6 days); higher rate of viral clearance w/ CQ vs controls by day 10 (96% vs 91%) and by day 14 (80% vs 57%); duration of fever shorter w/ CQ; no difference in LOS; similar rates of ADRs in both groups (CQ 27%, control 32%) w/ no serious ADRs in CQ group
- Study considerations: non-randomized; historical controls treated w/ various antivirals; demographics and tx differed across time and btwn sites, incl dosing and timing of tx start; mostly moderate dz; incomplete clinical and lab data collection
- Access pre-print medRxiv article
HIV protease inhibitors (eg, lopinavir, darunavir) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: interferes w/ maturation of viral particles by inhibiting protease enzymes
- Drugs under investigation: lopinavir/ritonavir, darunavir w/ ritonavir, darunavir/cobicistat
A Trial of Lopinavir–Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized With Severe Covid-19 - Open-label RCT; 199 hospitalized pts (mean age, 58y) w/ confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and O2 sat ≤94% on RA randomized 1:1 to LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg bid x14 days plus SOC, or SOC alone; 13 days median time btwn sx onset and randomization; SOC group had higher rates of vasopressor use (27% vs 17%), noninvasive mech vent (19% vs 10%), and invasive mech vent (18% vs 14%)
- No difference in median time to clinical improvement (LPV/r 16 days vs SOC 16 days) or 28-day mortality (LPV/r 19% vs SOC 25%); rate of detectable viral load similar between groups at all sampling timepoints; similar rates of ADRs (LPV/r 48% vs SOC 50%), 14% of LPV/r pts D/C due to ADRs
- Study considerations: randomized but open-label; delayed tx initiation from sx onset; viral kinetics showed possible lack of antiviral effect (LPV/r exposure at normal doses lower vs concentrations needed for anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity)
- Access the free full-text N Engl J Med article
Other studies: - Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Arbidol in Adult Patients With Mild/Moderate COVID-19: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial; access Med article
- Lopinavir-Ritonavir Alone or Combined With Arbidol in the Treatment of 73 Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Pilot Retrospective Study; access pre-print medRxiv article
- Treating COVID-19 With Chloroquine [vs LPV/r]; access J Mol Cell Biol article
- Triple Combination of Interferon Beta-1b, Lopinavir-Ritonavir, and Ribavirin in the Treatment of Patients Admitted to Hospital With COVID-19: An Open-label, Randomized, Phase 2 Trial; access Lancet article
- Antiviral Activity and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat for the Treatment of COVID-19; access Open Forum Infect Dis article
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: inhibits viral polymerase acidic protein endonuclease activity, inhibiting viral replication; reported in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2
Clinical Outcomes and Plasma Concentrations of Baloxavir Marboxil and Favipiravir in COVID-19 Patients: An Exploratory Randomized, Controlled Trial; access pre-print medRxiv article
ACEIs/ARBs (eg, losartan, ramipril) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: blocks viral entry by inhibiting ACE2 receptors
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: activity against RNA-dependent RNA polymerases; in vitro activity against arboviruses (eg, Zika)
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces infectivity and virulence by inhibiting conversion of plasminogen to plasmin (plasmin interacts w/ viral surface proteins to increase binding to cellular receptors)
DPP-4 inhibitors (eg, linagliptin) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: blocks viral entry; reportedly blocks MERS-CoV entry receptor (DPP-4)
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: targets mTOR complex involved in replication of various viruses, including coronaviruses
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: inhibits kinases which may play role in viral entry, replication, and egress; prevents viral/cell fusion via lysosomal alkalinization; anti-inflammatory activity in animal models attenuates acute lung injury
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inhibition of host antiviral response by blocking transport of viral proteins into nucleus
- Pharmacokinetic studies show that doses up to 10x the usual human dose result in concentrations that are substantially lower than those assoc w/ in vitro antiviral activity
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: interferes w/ host-regulated pathways involved in viral replication rather than a virus-targeted mechanism; broad-spectrum in vitro activity against various viruses, including coronaviruses
- Pharmacokinetic studies show that higher doses (at least 3x usual dose) may be needed to achieve adequate concentrations for antiviral activity
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: binds to protease implicated in viral replication
Published studies: - Famotidine Use is Associated With Improved Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Retrospective Cohort Study; full-text Gastroenterology article
- Famotidine Use and Quantitative Symptom Tracking for COVID-19 in Hon-hospitalized Patients: A Case Series: full-text Gut article
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: inhibits coronavirus proteases; reduces inflammatory cytokine release by blocking pyroptosis pathway
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: terminates viral replication by binding to RNA-dependent RNA polymerase
- Not currently available in the U.S. Used in Japan for tx of influenza. First approved drug in China for tx of COVID-19
- Also known as favilavir, fapilavir, Avigan
Favipiravir vs Arbidol for COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Prospective, open-label, multicenter RCT; 240 adult pts (71% age <65y; 42% pts w/ positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2; 96% w/ CT findings suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonia) received either umifenovir (Arbidol) 200 mg tid x7-10 days (n=120) or FPV 1,600 mg bid x1 on day 1, then 600 mg bid x7-10 days total (n=116); all pts received SOC
- No significant difference in primary endpoint of clinical recovery rate on day 7 (61% FPV, 51% umifenovir); quicker defervescence and sx relief w/ FPV in pts w/ moderate dz; no difference in rate of auxiliary O2 tx or noninvasive mechanical ventilation; higher serum uric acid in FPV group
- Study considerations: active control; more severe/critical pts in FPV group; pts received other antivirals and traditional Chinese medicine; limited observation time frame
- Access pre-print medRxiv article
Experimental Treatment With Favipiravir for COVID-19: An Open-Label Control Study - Open-label, non-randomized, before-after controlled study; 80 pts (median age, 47y) w/ confirmed COVID-19 received either FPV 1,600 mg bid x2 doses, then 600 mg bid (n=35) or LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg bid (n=45) for up to 14 days or until viral clearance; pts excl if >7 days from sx onset, >75 yo, or severe clinical status, incl SaO2 <93%; all pts received inhaled IFN, and SOC
- Median time to viral clearance shorter in FPV pts (4 days vs 11 days); no difference in chest CT improvement rates on day 4 and 8, but higher rates seen in FPV pts on day 14 (91% vs 62%); higher CT improvement rates also assoc w/ pts w/ <7-day viral clearance time; more adverse events in LPV/r group (56% vs 11%)
- Study considerations: non-randomized, open-label study; excl older and severe pts; possible historical bias; relationship btwn viral titer and clinical prognosis not well defined
- Access Engineering article
Other studies: - Clinical Outcomes and Plasma Concentrations of Baloxavir Marboxil and Favipiravir in COVID-19 Patients: An Exploratory Randomized, Controlled Trial; access pre-print medRxiv article
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: inhibits fusion of viral and cellular membranes by intercalating into membrane lipids
- Not currently available in the U.S. Used in Russia and China for tx of influenza
- Also known as Arbidol
Favipiravir vs Arbidol for COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Prospective, open-label, multicenter RCT; 240 adult pts (71% age <65y; 42% pts w/ positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2; 96% w/ CT findings suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonia) received either umifenovir (Arbidol) 200 mg tid x7-10 days (n=120) or FPV 1,600 mg bid x1 on day 1, then 600 mg bid x7-10 days total (n=116); all pts received SOC
- No significant difference in primary endpoint of clinical recovery rate on day 7 (61% FPV, 51% umifenovir); quicker defervescence and sx relief w/ FPV in pts w/ moderate dz; no difference in rate of auxiliary O2 tx or noninvasive mechanical ventilation; higher serum uric acid in FPV group
- Study considerations: active control; more severe/critical pts in FPV group; pts received other antivirals and traditional Chinese medicine; limited observation time frame
- Access pre-print medRxiv article
Other trials: - Arbidol Combined With LPV/r vs LPV/r Alone Against Corona Virus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort Study; access J Infect article
- Arbidol Monotherapy Is Superior to Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Treating COVID-19; access J Infect article
- Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Arbidol in Adult Patients With Mild/Moderate COVID-19: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial; access Med article
- Lopinavir-Ritonavir Alone or Combined With Arbidol in the Treatment of 73 Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Pilot Retrospective Study; access pre-print medRxiv article
-
Immunomodulating drugs (eg, corticosteroids, tocilizumab)
corticosteroids (eg, dexamethasone) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response via inhibition of multiple cytokines
- Drugs under investigation: dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, inhaled budesonide, inhaled ciclesonide
Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 — Preliminary Report - Randomized, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform study; current analysis incl dexamethasone vs SOC only, results for other tx arms forthcoming
- Hospitalized pts (mean age 66.1y) w/ suspected or confirmed COVID-19 (89% pts positive) randomized to dexamethasone 6 mg PO/IV qd for up to 10 days (n=2,104) vs SOC only (n=4,321); other tx incl AZ (22%), HCQ (<1%), and IL-6 antagonist (1.9%); 16% pts needed mech vent or ECMO, 60% needed O2 only; median tx duration: 7 days; median sx duration before tx: 8-9 days
- 28-day all-cause mortality lower in dexamethasone vs SOC group (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.93); pre-specified subgroup analysis showed greater benefit in mech vent pts (36% RR reduction) and non-intubated pts on O2 (18% RR reduction) but no benefit in pts not needing resp support
- Hospital stay shorter w/ dexamethasone vs SOC (12 vs 13 days) w/ greater probability of discharge w/in 28 days (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.17) and lower risk of progression to invasive mech vent (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95)
- Study considerations: randomized but open-label; incl limited numbers of peds, pregnant, and breastfeeding pts; excl pts w/ contraindication or definitive indication for dexamethasone
- Access full-text N Engl J Med article
Early Short Course Corticosteroids in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19
- Multicenter, quasi-experimental study; institutional protocol modified to incl early CS initiation; outcomes compared before and after protocol implementation; post group pts received early methylprednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day IV divided in 2 doses x3 days (up to 7 days if ICU care); 57% pre-protocol and 68% post-protocol pts received CS
- 213 hospitalized pts (median 62y; 81 pre-protocol, 132 post-protocol) w/ confirmed mod-severe COVID-19 tx w/ SOC + antivirals; CS dose and duration similar btwn groups but earlier initiation in post group (2 vs 5 days); COPD more frequent in pre-protocol group
- Lower rate of composite endpoint (ICU transfer, mech vent, death) in post-protocol (35%) vs pre-protocol (54%); median LOS reduced by 3 days w/ CS use
- Study considerations: quasi-experimental design; varied antiviral tx and timing; guideline adherence in post-protocol group not universal; limited f/u
- Access full-text Clin Infect Dis article
Other published studies: - Historically Controlled Comparison of Glucocorticoids With or Without Tocilizumab Versus Supportive Care Only in Patients With COVID-19-Associated Cytokine Storm Syndrome: Results of the CHIC Study; access Ann Rheum Dis article
- Effect of Systemic Glucocorticoids on Mortality or Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With COVID-19; access J Hosp Med article
- Therapeutic Potential of Ciclesonide Inhalation for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Report of Three Cases; access J Infect Chemother article
IL-6 inhibitors (eg, tocilizumab) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting IL-6 receptors
Tocilizumab for Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19 - Retrospective cohort study; 154 hospitalized pts (median age 58y) w/ severe COVID-19 not eligible for clinical trial enrollment requiring mech vent received TCZ 8 mg/kg x1 (max 800 mg) w/ SOC (n=78) or SOC alone (n=76); SOC incl HCQ or RDV, w/ or w/o CS; SOC only pts were older and generally sicker; 4 pts received a 2nd TCZ dose
- Adjusted analysis: TCZ assoc w/ lower risk of death (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.9) and 28-day case fatality rate (18% vs 36%) and improved status; TCZ assoc w/ more superinfections (54% vs 26%), though no significant difference in 28-day case fatality rate among TCZ pts w/ or w/o superinfection (22% vs 15%)
- Study considerations: retrospective, small sample size; imbalanced baseline characteristics; selection bias; propensity score inverse probability weighting; missing data; protocols not standardized
- Access full-text Clin Infect Dis article
Pilot Prospective Open, Single-arm Multicentre Study on Off-label Use of Tocilizumab in Patients With Severe COVID-19 - Prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study; 63 hospitalized pts (mean age 62.6 y) w/ confirmed severe COVID-19 and markedly abnormal pro-inflammatory profile received TCZ 8 mg/kg IV (n=34) or 324 mg SC (n=29) x1 dose, 83% received 2nd dose w/ in 24h; all pts received antivirals (71% LPV/r, 29% DRV/c); 8% w/ invasive mech vent
- Overall mortality 11% (no difference btwn routes); oxygenation and D-dimer and CRP levels significantly improved over time; TCZ w/in 6 days from admission assoc w/ incr likelihood of survival (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-6.7); no severe ADRs reported
- Study considerations: single-arm, open-label study; small sample size; heterogeneous antiviral tx and TCZ admin routes; SC dose based on PK in RA pts; timing of tx; limited f/u
- Access full-text Clin Exp Rheumatol article
Tocilizumab in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study - Retrospective, multicenter, cohort study; 544 pts (median age 67y) w/ severe COVID-19 received TCZ (8 mg/kg IV q12h x2 doses, max 800 mg/dose, or 162 mg SC x2 doses) + SOC (n=179) or SOC alone (n=365); SOC incl. HCQ +/- AZ, LPV/r, or DRV/c, and LMWH for DVT prophylaxis; 30% TCZ pts received steroids vs 17% in SOC-only group; at baseline, TCZ group younger (median age 64y vs 69y) but sicker (higher SOFA scores, lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios)
- Composite primary outcome: mech vent rate similar w/ TCZ vs SOC (18% vs 16%) but death rate lower w/ TCZ (7% vs 20%); TCZ assoc w/ reduced mech vent or death risk in adjusted analysis (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.4-0.92); more new infxns w/ TCZ vs SOC (13% vs 4%)
- Study considerations: retrospective; treatment bias; TCZ group w/ sicker pts and higher rate of steroid tx; limited f/u
- Access full-text Lancet Rheumatol article
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting IL-6 receptors
Expanded Access/Compassionate Use:
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting IL-6 receptors
IL-1 inhibitors (eg, anakinra) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting IL-1 receptors
- Drugs under investigation include: anakinra, canakinumab
Anakinra for Severe Forms of COVID-19: A Cohort Study - Retrospective cohort study; 96 hospitalized non-ICU pts w/ severe COVID-19 managed w/ SOC, incl HCQ, AZ, other abx, CS, DVT prophylaxis; prospective cohort of 52 pts received anakinra (100 mg SC bid x72h, then 100 mg SC daily x7 days) + SOC; 44 pts as historical control treated w/ SOC only; anakinra group had lower BMI, longer sx duration, higher baseline plt count, higher concomitant HCQ and AZ use
- Composite primary outcome of mech vent or death: anakinra 25% vs SOC 73% (hazard ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.1-0.49); elevated LFTs w/ anakinra 13% vs SOC 9%; similar results observed for death alone or need for mech vent alone
- Study considerations: retrospective, small sample size, historical bias; imbalanced baseline characteristics
- Access full-text Lancet Rheumatol article
Interleukin-1 Blockade With High-dose Anakinra in Patients With COVID-19, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, and Hyperinflammation: A Retrospective Cohort Study - Retrospective cohort study; 52 hospitalized non-ICU pts w/ confirmed COVID-19, mod-severe ARDS, and hyperinflammation managed w/ non-invasive vent and SOC, incl HCQ and LPV/r; 29 pts (median age 62y) received high-dose (HD) anakinra 5 mg/kg IV bid until sustained clinical benefit; 16 pts (median age 70y) as historical comparator treated w/ SOC only; low-dose group (anakinra 100 mg SC bid; n=7) terminated early due to lack of efficacy
- Respiratory fxn improved in 72% HD vs 50% SOC; 10% HD pts died vs 44% SOC; higher cumulative survival in HD (90% vs 56%), no difference in mech vent-free survival; HD assoc w/ CRP decr at day 21 vs no decr w/ SOC
- 24% on high dose D/C due to ADRs; 14% HD pts vs 13% SOC pts developed bacteremia; 10% HD pts vs 31% SOC pts had incr LFTs; no rebound inflammation
- Study considerations: retrospective; small sample size; historical bias; selection bias; varied dosing regimens
- Access Lancet Rheumatol article
JAK inhibitors (eg, ruxolitinib) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by disrupting cytokine pathways via inhibition of janus-associated kinases (JAK)
- Drugs under investigation include: baricitinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib
Expanded Access/Compassionate Use - Ruxolitinib Managed Access Program (MAP) for Patients Diagnosed With Severe/Very Severe COVID-19 Illness, NCT04337359
Ruxolitinib in Treatment of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Multicenter, Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial - Prospective, single-blind, multicenter RCT; 41 pts (median age 63y) w/ severe COVID-19 randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ruxolitinib 5 mg PO bid + SOC (n=20) or vitamin C 100 mg PO bid + SOC (n=21); SOC incl antivirals, CS, and abx; median time btwn sx onset and randomization 20 days; no significant differences in baseline demographics; antivirals and CS used in 90% and 71% of pts, respectively
- No difference in time to, or rate of, clinical improvement; significant CT improvement at day 14 w/ ruxolitinib (90% vs 62%); 28% overall mortality at day 28 (ruxolitinib 0% vs vitamin C 14%), no difference in cumulative incidence of death btwn 2 groups
- No difference in total number of ADRs btwn 2 groups; no difference in median time of viral clearance; shorter median time of lymphopenia recovery in ruxolitinib group; cytokine levels significantly decreased in ruxolitinib group
- Study considerations: randomized but single-blind; small sample size and early termination; excluded critically ill and mech vent pts; inconclusive results based on limited data and analysis
- Access J Allergy Clin Immunol abstract
Pharmacology/Background - Proposed mechanism: no direct antiviral activity; indirect immunomodulatory effects
- Incr QT prolongation risk when used w/ HCQ or CQ; monitor ECG; FDA MedWatch (4/24/20): Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for COVID-19: Drug Safety Communication - FDA Cautions Against Use Outside of the Hospital Setting or a Clinical Trial Due to Risk of Heart Rhythm Problems; see FDA alert
Association of Treatment With Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin With In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York State - Retrospective multicenter cohort study; 1,438 randomly selected hospitalized pts (median age 63y) in NYC metro area w/ confirmed COVID-19 treated w/ HCQ (n=271) or AZ (n=211) alone, HCQ+AZ (n=735), or no tx (n=221); significant imbalances btwn groups, incl gender, comorbidities, and clinical severity
- Unadjusted analysis for in-hospital mortality (overall 20%), HCQ+AZ 26%, HCQ 20%, AZ 10%, no tx 13%; adjusted analysis for in-hospital mortality showed no differences when comparing pts w/ no tx to each drug group, and when comparing HCQ vs AZ
- Abnormal ECG more common in HCQ+AZ (27%) and HCQ (27%) vs AZ (16%) and no tx (14%), but no difference in adjusted analysis; more pts w/ cardiac arrest in HCQ+AZ (16%) and HCQ (14%) vs AZ (6%) and no tx (7%)
- Study considerations: retrospective, random sampling; imbalanced baseline characteristics; treatment bias; varied dosing and duration; possible missed readmissions; ADRs at any time during hospital visit, potentially prior to tx
- Access JAMA article
Note: Published data summaries include AZ as mono-tx. For published studies on combo tx, refer to HCQ.
Complement inhibitors (eg, eculizumab) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by modulating activity of complement pathways
- Drugs under investigation include: eculizumab, ravalizumab
Expanded Access/Compassionate Use: Published studies: - Combination of Ruxolitinib and Eculizumab for Treatment of Severe SARS-CoV-2-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Controlled Study; access Front Pharmacol article
BTK inhibitors (eg, acalabrutinib) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting malignant B-cell proliferation via inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK)
- Drugs under investigation include: acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, zanubrutinib
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting tumor necrosis factor alpha
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: inhibits bradykinin generation by binding plasma kallikrein; possible role for dysregulated bradykinin signaling in COVID-19 respiratory complications
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting T lymphocytes; shown to inhibit replication of several coronaviruses in vitro
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: binds to interferon receptors, modulates immune responses to some viral infxns; in vitro studies indicate weak IFN induction in SARS-CoV-2 infxn
- Generally used in combo w/ other antivirals; IFN beta more potent than IFN alpha for coronaviruses; IFN lambda has less inflammatory effects on respiratory tract
Published studies: - Efficacy and Safety of Interferon Beta-1a in Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial; pre-print medRxiv article
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: may enhance viral immune response while mitigating cytokine storm
Pharmacology/Background - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by reducing release of substance P via inhibition of neurokinin-1 receptors
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by selectively modulating T-cell activation
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by disrupting cytokine pathways via inhibition of exportin 1 (XPO1); XPO1 inhibitors have activity against many viruses, incl RNA viruses, and expected to have activity against SARS-CoV
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by disrupting cytokine pathways via inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)
Pharmacology/background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response; has been effective for cytokine storm caused by other diseases; topoisomerase II inhibitors suppress RNA virus replication in vitro
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity reduces development of ARDS; alters certain signaling pathways via inhibition of DNA methylation
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; in vitro effects against SARS-CoV-2
- For U.S. trials, see ClinicalTrials.gov
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting interleukin pathways via interference w/ inflammasome complex assembly; reduces cell infectivity by interrupting endocytosis via inhibition of microtubule polymerization
Effect of Colchicine vs Standard Care on Cardiac and Inflammatory Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: The GRECCO-19 Randomized Clinical Trial - Prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized study; 105 hospitalized pts (median age 64y) w/ confirmed COVID-19 tx w/ colchicine 1.5 mg x1 then 0.5 mg after 60min, then 0.5 mg bid (n=55) + SOC or SOC only (n=50) for up to 3wk; most pts received CQ/HCQ (98%) and AZ (92%); study terminated early due to low enrollment
- Clinical deterioration rate lower in colchicine group (2% vs 14%); mean event-free survival time greater in colchicine group (20.7 vs 18.6 days); no difference in max high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels or peak CRP levels; overall adverse events similar, but diarrhea more frequent w/ colchicine
- Study considerations: randomized but open-label; small sample size; inconclusive results based on limited data and analysis
- Access full-text JAMA Netw Open article
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by blunting catecholamine effects on cytokine production
SSRIs (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by inhibiting IL-6 receptors or binding to sigma-1 receptors
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response by mitigating cytokine activation pathways; attenuates CV component or complications assoc w/ COVID-19; epidemiological data suggest protective effects in influenza pneumonia
-
Adjunctive drugs (eg, ascorbic acid, antithrombotics)
ascorbic acid (vitamin C) Pharmacology/Background:
- Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response and production of reactive oxygen species via anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties; supports host defenses and protects host cells against oxidative stress
- For additional info, see Alt Med Remedy Use in COVID-19
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces susceptibility to infxn by supporting antimicrobial peptide production in respiratory epithelium; reduces inflammatory response by countering downregulation of ACE2 by SARS-CoV-2
- For additional info, see Alt Med Remedy Use in COVID-19
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: binds to fibrin and converts tissue plasminogen to plasmin, promoting fibrinolysis of microvascular thromboses and occlusions in pulmonary vasculature
antithrombotics (eg, heparin, LMWH, dipyridamole, argatroban, fondaparinux) Pharmacology/Background: - Mechanism: See individual drugs
- COVID-19 assoc w/ hypercoagulable state; thrombotic events reported despite pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis; higher prophylactic doses and/or prolonged courses may be needed; unclear role for empiric therapeutic-dose anticoagulation
- Anticoagulants under investigation: enoxaparin, heparin (IV, SC, neb, intranasal), argatroban, fondaparinux, apixaban, rivaroxaban
- Antiplatelet agents under investigation: dipyridamole, aspirin/dipyridamole, clopidogrel
epocrates drug links: heparin, enoxaparin, Lovenox, Fragmin, argatroban, Argatroban, fondaparinux, Arixtra, dipyridamole, Persantine, aspirin/dipyridamole, Aggrenox, clopidogrel, Plavix, Eliquis, Xarelto
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: blocks interactions btwn endothelial cells, platelets, RBCs, leukocytes (monoclonal Ab)
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: hydrolyzes extracellular DNA, decreasing mucus viscosity
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: reduces inflammatory response via replenishment of glutathione and reduction of proinflammatory cytokines; supports host defenses and protects host cells against oxidative stress
- For additional info, see Alt Med Remedy Use in COVID-19
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: attenuates dysregulation of various mechanistic processes involved in acute illness, incl energy metabolism, autophagy, oxidative stress, tissue hypoxia, and inflammation
hormonal tx (eg, estrogen, antiandrogens) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: animal studies of SARS-CoV-1 suggest protective effects of estrogen, incl immunomodulating effects and wound repair processes; androgen receptor expression assoc w/ incr expression of host proteins needed for SARS-CoV-2 viral entry
- Drugs under investigation include: estrogen, progesterone, bicalutamide, degarelix, dutasteride
pulmonary vasodilators (eg, nitric oxide, epoprostenol, aviptadil) Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: dilates pulmonary vasculature, leading to vasodilation and increased oxygenation
- Nitric oxide reported to have in vitro activity against other coronaviruses (eg, SARS-CoV)
- Drugs under investigation include: nitric oxide, sodium nitrite, epoprostenol, aviptadil
Expanded Access/Compassionate Use:
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: interacts w/ GABA receptors in lungs to reduce cytokine production and stimulate bronchodilation, leading to improved oxygenation; possible activity against some viruses and bacteria
- Drugs under investigation: isoflurane
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: impairs replication of various viruses, incl coronaviruses, by inhibiting RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; intracellular concentrations increased by HCQ and CQ
- For additional info, see Alt Med Remedy Use in COVID-19
Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Plus Zinc vs Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Alone: Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients; access pre-print medRxiv article
-
Expanded Access/Compassionate Use: Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on Time to Clinical Improvement in Patients With Severe and Life-threatening COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial - Multicenter, open-label, randomized study; 103 hospitalized pts (median age 70y) w/ confirmed severe or life-threatening COVID-19, randomized 1:1 by dz severity to receive convalescent plasma 200 mL (n=52) or SOC alone (n=51)
- Donors recovered from COVID-19, discharged from hospital >14 days, S-protein-specific Ab titers >1:640
- No significant difference in time to clinical improvement w/in 28 days overall (convalescent plasma 51.9%, control 43.1%); in pts w/ severe dz, time to clinical improvement rate higher w/ convalescent plasma (91.3%) vs control (68.2%); no significant difference vs placebo in 28-day mortality (15% vs 24%), time to discharge (51% vs 36%); higher negative viral PCR conversion rate w/ convalescent plasma (87.2%) vs control (27.5%)
- Study considerations: randomized, but open label; early termination due to epidemic containment; small sample size, possibly underpowered; median time 30 days btwn sx onset and randomization; SOC not protocolized, study center variability; limited f/u
- Access JAMA abstract
Safety Update: COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in 20,000 Hospitalized Patients - Multicenter open-label Expanded Access Program; 20,000 hospitalized pts (60% of pts over 60y, 61% male, 58% ICU pts) w/ severe or life-threatening COVID-19 received ABO-compatible COVID-19 convalescent plasma 200-500 mL IV per protocol
- Outcomes w/in 1st 4h of transfusion: 146 (<1%) serious adverse events (SAEs) classified as transfusion rxn incl transfusion-assoc circulatory overload (n=37), transfusion-related acute lung injury (n=20), severe allergic transfusion rxn (n=26); 13 transfusion-related deaths
- Outcomes w/in 7 days of tx completion: 1,136 SAEs incl thromboembolic/thrombotic event (n=87), hypotensive events requiring pressor support (n=406), cardiac events (n=643); majority of thromboembolic/thrombotic complications (n=55) and cardiac events (n=596) deemed unrelated to plasma transfusion; overall 7-day mortality rate 8.6%
- Study considerations: non-comparative; safety data only, no efficacy data; some reported SAEs may represent natural dz progression; other transfusion-related theoretical risks not reported; detailed training of study personnel lacking; web-based case reporting
- Access Mayo Clin Proc article
Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 With Convalescent Plasma - Case series; 5 critically ill pts (ages 36-73y) w/ severe COVID-19 pneumonia and high viral load despite antiviral tx, PaO2/FiO2 <300, and current or prior mechanical ventilation; 400 mL convalescent plasma x1 given btwn 10-22 days after admission
- Donors recovered from COVID-19, asymptomatic for >10 days, SARS-CoV-2-specific Ab titers >1:1000, neutralizing Ab titer >40
- SOFA scores, PaO2/FiO2 ratios, and fever curves improved for all pts w/ negative viral load by day 12 post-transfusion; 3 of 5 pts extubated and discharged home, remaining 2 pts still on mechanical ventilation
- Study considerations: non-comparative; small sample size; pts received other antivirals; delayed tx initiation from hospital admission; safety data not reported
- Access full-text JAMA article
Effectiveness of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Severe COVID-19 Patients - Case series; 10 pts (median age, 53y) w/ severe COVID-19; all pts received other antivirals, 6 pts received methylprednisolone; 3 pts mechanically ventilated, 3 pts on high-flow NC, 4 pts on low-flow NC or RA; all pts received 200 mL convalescent plasma x1 at 10-20 days after sx onset
- Donors recovered from COVID-19, afebrile for >3 days, negative viral load on consecutive samples; donor transfusions had neutralizing Ab titers >1:640
- Sx and oxygenation improved in all pts; 2 pts extubated, 1 pt D/C high-flow NC; all pts had negative viral load by day 6 post-transfusion (3 pts w/ negative viral load before transfusion); no serious safety events reported
- Study considerations: non-comparative; small sample size; excl pts w/ severe organ dysfxn; pts received other antiviral agents; delayed tx initiation from hospital admission
- Access full-text Proc Natl Acad Sci USA article
-
Pharmacology/Background:
- Proposed mechanism: provides passive immunity
- Retrospective study; 325 hospitalized pts (mean age, 58y) w/ confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (68% severe, 32% critical); 174 pts received IVIG 0.1-0.5 g/kg daily x5-15 days, 151 pts received SOC only; IVIG pts had more severe dz (higher APACHE II, SOFA scores, O2 needs
- No significant difference in 28-day in-hospital mortality (13% in both groups) or 60-day in-hospital mortality (19% IVIG, 14% non-IVIG); IVIG group had longer length of stay (23.5 vs 16 days) and longer dz duration (31 vs 23 days)
- Study considerations: retrospective; treatment bias; IVIG timing, dosing, and duration varied among sites
- Access pre-print medRxiv article
-
Pharmacology/Background:
- Proposed mechanism: induces antibody formation
Published studies: - An mRNA Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2—Preliminary Report: access Engl J Med article
- Safety and Immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2: A Preliminary Report of a Phase 1/2, Single-blind, Randomised Controlled Trial; access Lancet article
- Immunogenicity and Safety of a Recombinant Adenovirus Type-5-vectored COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged 18 Years or Older: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Trial; access Lancet article
Pharmacology/Background: - Proposed mechanism: induces nonspecific immune effects
- Vaccines under investigation: BCG, MMR
|
