epocrates logo
epocrates logo
epocrates logo
  • 0

Diseases

Small bowel obstruction

OVERVIEW

  • Highlights & Basics
  • Images

DIAGNOSIS

  • Diagnostic Approach
  • Risk Factors
  • History & Exam
  • Tests
  • Differential Diagnosis

TREATMENT

  • Tx Approach
  • Tx Options
  • Prevention

FOLLOW-UP

  • Overview
  • Complications

REFERENCES

  • Citations
  • Guidelines
  • Credits

PATIENT RESOURCES

  • Patient Instructions

Highlights & Basics

AAFont SizeShareMore Information
Key Highlights
  • Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a medical emergency that requires early diagnosis and potential surgical intervention.

  • It typically presents with the combined symptoms of abdominal pain, bloating, vomiting, and failure to pass flatus or stool per rectum. Peritonitis is generally present if the obstruction has progressed to ischemia/gangrene and/or perforation.

  • Diagnosis is generally based upon clinical and imaging features. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen is usually the initial imaging modality.

  • Treatment involves a combination of nasogastric decompression and intravenous fluids. Surgery may be required, so the diagnosis requires urgent surgical assessment.

  • Patients who are treated in a timely manner have a very good prognosis. If untreated, it can progress to intestinal necrosis, perforation, sepsis, and multi-organ failure.

Abdominal x-ray showing partial intestinal obstruction
Abdominal x-ray showing partial intestinal obstruction
From the collection of Dr David J. Hackam

Quick Reference

  • History & Exam

    • Key Factors

      • abdominal pain

      • constipation/failure to pass flatus or stool

      • vomiting

      • abdominal distention

      • abdominal tenderness

      • peritonitis

      • palpable abdominal mass

    • Other Factors

      • nausea

      • fever

      • tachycardia

      • tachypnea

      • severe lethargy

      • hypotension

      • diarrhea

      • groin swelling

    More information...
  • Diagnostics Tests

    • 1st Tests to Order

      • abdominal CT scan

      • CBC

      • BUN

      • electrolyte panel

    • Other Tests to consider

      • abdominal x-rays

      • water-soluble contrast study

      • laparotomy/laparoscopy

      • abdominal ultrasound

      • abdominal MRI

    More information...
  • Treatment Options

    • acute

      • complicated or strangulated SBO: surgical candidate

        • emergency surgery plus fluid resuscitation

        • preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis

        • preoperative nasogastric decompression

        • analgesia

        • correction of the underlying cause

    More information...

Definition

SBO is a mechanical disruption in the patency of the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in a combination of emesis (that may be bilious), absolute constipation, and abdominal pain.

Classifications

According to the nature of the obstruction

Partial (incomplete) bowel obstruction
  • Blockage of the intestine is not complete, resulting in partial passage of flatus and occasionally stool.

Complete bowel obstruction
  • Blockage of the intestine completely obstructs the lumen of the intestine, resulting in failure to pass flatus and stool. Complete bowel obstruction is associated with a higher requirement for bowel resection than partial obstruction, and was previously considered an indication for operative management.[1] However, evidence has shown that a proportion of patients (41% to 73%) may have resolution of the obstruction with nonoperative therapy.[1]

Simple bowel obstruction
  • Intestinal blockage in the absence of intestinal ischemia/gangrene and/or perforation or peritonitis; may respond to nonoperative therapy.

Complicated bowel obstruction
  • Surgical emergency in which the obstruction has progressed to intestinal ischemia/gangrene and/or perforation. Peritonitis is usually present. This is a life-threatening situation that requires urgent resuscitation and surgical intervention.

Vignette

Common Vignette 1

A 27-year-old man presents with crampy abdominal pain of sudden onset, emesis, and failure to pass any gas or stool for 24 hours. The patient has no history of prior surgery. Physical exam reveals peritonitis. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan reveals the level of the obstruction.

Common Vignette 2

A 43-year-old woman with a prior history of open cholecystectomy presents with gradual onset of nausea, vomiting, absolute constipation, and abdominal distention. Physical exam does not demonstrate peritonitis. Abdominal CT scan confirms the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction.

Epidemiology

The lifetime incidence of small bowel obstruction (SBO) varies between 0.1% and 5% in patients who have not undergone previous surgery, yet may rise to over 60% in patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgery.[2] [3] [4] In patients with Crohn disease, the incidence may be upward of 25%. In children, 1 in 5000 cases are reported at birth and 0.5% in the first 2 years of life.[5]
SBO is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and it can be fatal in untreated patients if it progresses to intestinal necrosis, perforation, sepsis, and multi-organ failure.

Etiology

Common causes of small bowel obstruction (SBO) in adults include:
  • Adhesions from previous intra-abdominal surgery or previous intra-abdominal infections

  • Acute incarcerated hernia including inguinal, femoral, ventral, incisional, umbilical, and parastomal hernias

  • Crohn disease

  • Intestinal malignancy

Common causes of SBO in children include:
  • Intussusception

  • Intestinal atresia

  • Volvulus

Rare causes include radiation enteritis, intra-abdominal abscess (from perforated appendicitis/diverticulitis), gallstone ileus, foreign body, and intestinal bezoar.

Pathophysiology

SBO represents an interruption in the patency of the gastrointestinal tract. The proximal dilation of the intestine, together with peristalsis, leads to abdominal cramping (colic), which can become severe. The abdominal pain may also be accompanied by vomiting, while the distal interruption of fecal flow leads to absolute constipation. In acute cases, there can be hyperperistalsis distal to the obstruction, leading to the finding of diarrhea. Obstructed bowel cancer, over time, prevents appropriate venous drainage with the possible result of decreased arterial perfusion. Untreated patients could develop progressive intestinal ischemia, necrosis, and perforation.
Authors
  • Adrian Maung, MD, MBA, FACS, FCCM
  • Acknowledgements
Peer Reviewers
  • Steven D. Wexner, MD, FACS, FRCS, FRCS (Ed)
content by BMJ Group
Last updated Fri Aug 15 2025

Images

  • ​Abdominal CT scan showing small bowel obstruction with multiple air-fluid levels, dilated bowel loo

    ​Abdominal CT scan showing small bowel obstruction with multiple air-fluid levels, dilated bowel loops and a transition zone in the right iliac fossa. Red arrows indicate the evident transition zone

  • Abdominal x-ray showing partial intestinal obstruction

    Abdominal x-ray showing partial intestinal obstruction

  • Abdominal x-ray showing complete intestinal obstruction

    Abdominal x-ray showing complete intestinal obstruction

Diagnostic Approach

General approach

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is an interruption of the patency of the gastrointestinal tract. The most common symptoms are abdominal pain, constipation or failure to pass flatus or stool per rectum, vomiting, and abdominal distention. If untreated, patients may develop progressive intestinal ischemia, necrosis, and perforation. Early diagnosis, monitoring, and intervention are therefore crucial.
Diagnosis should encompass the anticipated urgency for intervention. It is important to consider:
  • the cause of the obstruction

  • whether the patient has a partial or complete SBO

  • whether the obstruction is simple (i.e., no peritonitis: may not require surgery) versus complicated (i.e., peritonitis is present: surgery definitely required).

The distinction between these various diagnostic possibilities can be based upon a combination of physical exam, abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan, abdominal x-rays (in selected patients), and blood tests (e.g., white blood cell count).
In children, especially infants, diagnosis requires the exclusion of intestinal volvulus as a cause for the obstruction. Failure to establish the diagnosis in a timely manner can result in necrosis of the entire midgut and can be fatal if left untreated.

History

A detailed history provides insights into the onset and timing of the abdominal pain, the nature of the vomiting (which may be bilious), and the history of passage of stool/flatus. Past medical history may provide clues to a potential cause of the obstruction (e.g., a history of prior surgery may suggest adhesive disease).[15] Patients may also report a lump or swelling suggesting a hernia.
  • In cases of simple or partial SBO, patients may have an acute onset of symptoms, but will generally continue to pass gas and stool, although in lower quantities. Uncommonly, where there is hyperperistalsis distal to the obstruction, diarrhea may occur. Fever may be present, but it is likely to be mild. Vomiting is typically, but not always, present and is likely to be bilious.

  • In complicated SBO, patients report emesis, absolute constipation (no passage of flatus or stool), severe lethargy, and fever with rigors and typically have worse pain.

Patients may or may not experience a prodrome before the onset of full symptoms, such as nausea with either partial or complete SBO.

Physical exam

  • Patients with simple SBO present with abdominal distention and mild, diffuse 4-quadrant abdominal tenderness.[15] They may appear sick, with mild dehydration. If an underlying malignancy is the cause of the SBO, a mass may be palpated in the abdomen. Patients are also classically described as having high-pitched (tinkling) increased-frequency bowel sounds early in presentation, but bowel sounds may become less frequent in those with late obstruction as a result of intestinal muscular fatigue.[16] [17] However, the accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction has been questioned.[18]

  • Patients with complicated SBO appear very ill at presentation. They demonstrate tachycardia and tachypnea, reflective of intravascular volume depletion and pain. In advanced stages, these patients may have fever and hypotension. The abdomen is usually distended, due to the obstructed bowel and the presence of ascites that develops in the setting of complete intestinal obstruction. Localized or generalized guarding together with signs of severe systemic illness, such as a high fever and tachycardia, may indicate that peritonitis has developed.[1]

  • Clinicians should also examine for the presence of incarcerated/strangulated hernias in the groin, umbilicus or prior incisions; the presence of surgical scars indicative of prior surgery; and manifestations of Crohn disease (e.g., mucositis, rash).

Investigations

When assessing a patient with intestinal obstruction, it is important to determine whether the patient has partial or complete, and simple or complicated SBO. In addition to the history and physical exam, the following investigations should be considered:
1. CT scan of the abdomen
  • A CT scan of the abdomen is the initial imaging investigation in patients with suspected intestinal obstruction.[17] [19]​ The sensitivity of the abdominal CT scan in detecting intestinal obstruction is 84% to 95%, depending on the degree of obstruction.[20] CT scan has a high (approximately 90%) accuracy in predicting intestinal strangulation and therefore the need for urgent surgery.[21]

  • CT is also useful in diagnosing other complications of SBO, including ischemia or necrosis.[16] [20] [21] [22] It can also detect underlying malignancy as a cause of SBO.[9]

  • A multidetector CT scanner and multiplanar reconstruction can be used, if available. They aid in the diagnosis and localization of the SBO.[1] [19] [23]
    ​Abdominal CT scan showing small bowel obstruction with multiple air-fluid levels, dilated bowel loo
    ​Abdominal CT scan showing small bowel obstruction with multiple air-fluid levels, dilated bowel loops and a transition zone in the right iliac fossa. Red arrows indicate the evident transition zone
    ​Di Saverio S, et al. Gut 2009; 58: 891-2; used with permission

2. Abdominal x-rays
  • Although CT-scan has a higher sensitivity and specificity than abdominal x-rays, abdominal x-rays may be considered in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected intestinal obstruction, particularly in patients who are hemodynamically unstable or unable to undergo cross-sectional imaging, or who have equivocal clinical findings. They should be performed in the upright (or decubitus if the patient is unable to stand) and supine positions.[17]Images

  • Studies testing the sensitivity of abdominal x-rays for detecting SBO have shown widely divergent results.[19] In addition, abdominal x-rays will not give information about the etiology of obstruction, and findings may be normal in patients with early or proximal obstruction.[17] As such, they could prolong the evaluation period.[19] Hence, CT scanning has replaced abdominal radiographs as the standard of care for diagnosing SBO.[19]

3. Laboratory tests
  • Early in the course of investigation, a basic blood-work panel should be obtained, including complete blood count, to assess for the presence of leukocytosis and anemia. Tests of renal and pancreatic function should also be performed, to assess whether organ dysfunction is present. Electrolytes should also be measured.

Other useful imaging modalities include:
4. Water-soluble contrast study
  • In patients with acute SBO as a result of adhesions, water-soluble contrast challenge may help estimate whether conservative treatment has been successful. Patients in which the contrast reaches the colon by 24 hours rarely require surgery.[19] [24] [25]

5. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen
  • Not generally performed; the procedure adds no information to that from a well-performed CT scan. However, MRI can be useful in some cases, such as in Crohn disease subacute SBO where diagnosis has been difficult, or to avoid recurrent doses of ionizing radiation in young patients.[19]

6. Ultrasound of the abdomen
  • Rarely performed in adults with SBO unless CT scanning is not available or cannot be performed. However, ultrasound performed by a specialist technician can be a useful diagnostic modality in children.

7. Diagnostic laparotomy/laparoscopy
  • May be performed in those cases in which it is difficult to distinguish between simple and complicated SBO, or between SBO and some other cause of abdominal pain. This can take place either through an open incision (laparotomy) or via a minimally invasive approach in the hands of experienced individuals (diagnostic laparoscopy).

View diagnostic guideline references

Risk Factors

strong Factors
Expand All

previous abdominal surgery

    • Can lead to intra-abdominal adhesions that may cause obstruction. Open abdominal surgery carries a greater risk of intra-abdominal adhesion-related small bowel obstruction compared with laparoscopic or robotic surgery.[6] [7] [8]

intestinal malignancy

    • Can lead to intestinal blockage as disease progresses, either from primary tumor or from metastases. Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common complication of intestinal malignancy; a retrospective study reported that 57.9% of patients admitted to hospital with small bowel adenocarcinoma presented with SBO.[9] [10]

malrotation

    • Can lead to midgut volvulus, resulting in the loss of the midgut, necrosis, and death.

Crohn disease

    • Can lead to the formation of an inflammatory phlegmon or strictures that may obstruct the intestine.

hernia

    • Inguinal, femoral, ventral, incisional, umbilical, and parastomal hernias can lead to incarceration and intestinal obstruction.

intussusception

    • Leads to intestinal obstruction as the intestine is "pinched off" during the process of intussusception.

volvulus

    • Always causes obstruction as the twisted intestine leads to the total loss of intestinal luminal patency.

intestinal atresia

    • Important cause of intestinal obstruction in newborn infants; the failure of intestinal development leads to an interruption of luminal patency.

weak Factors
Expand All

appendicitis

    • A rare cause of obstruction.[11] Can lead to obstruction of the intestine due to the formation of an inflammatory phlegmon/abscess.

foreign body ingestion

    • Ingested foreign bodies can cause a mass effect in the intestinal lumen and prevent the passage of intestinal contents.

History & Exam

Key Factors

Frequency

Expand All

abdominal pain

common

  • Often described as crampy and intermittent; can be severe. May be accompanied by vomiting, and often precedes the onset of vomiting.

common

constipation/failure to pass flatus or stool

common

  • Due to distal interruption of fecal flow. Constipation is not always absolute. Some patients may still pass flatus and small amounts of stool especially early in the course.[27]

common

vomiting

common

  • May be bilious; occurs after onset of pain.

common

abdominal distention

common

  • A common finding in patients with small bowel obstruction. May be less prominent with more proximal obstructions. It is classically associated with high-pitched, increased frequency bowel sounds; however, the accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction has been questioned.[18]

common

abdominal tenderness

common

  • Moderate to severe tenderness may be associated with intestinal ischemia; a sign of progressive disease and impending tissue necrosis.

common

peritonitis

common

  • In the setting of intestinal ischemia, necrosis, and/or perforation.

common

palpable abdominal mass

uncommon

  • A mass may be palpated in the abdomen, suggestive of an underlying malignancy as the cause of the small bowel obstruction.

uncommon

Other Factors

Frequency

Expand All

nausea

common

  • This is an early event in the setting of either partial or complete small bowel obstruction.

common

fever

common

  • Nonspecific inflammatory response to the presence of obstruction. In cases of simple small bowel obstruction (SBO), fever may be present, but is likely to be mild. In complicated SBO, patients report fever with rigors.

common

tachycardia

common

  • Reflective of dehydration and pain.

common

tachypnea

common

  • Reflective of dehydration and pain.

common

severe lethargy

common

  • Present in complicated small bowel obstruction or patients with severe dehydration.

common

hypotension

common

  • May be present in advanced stages of complicated small bowel obstruction.

common

diarrhea

uncommon

  • In acute small bowel obstruction, there can be hyperperistalsis distal to the obstruction, leading to diarrhea.

uncommon

groin swelling

uncommon

  • May be due to the presence of incarcerated and/or strangulated hernias in the groin.

uncommon

Tests

1st Tests to Order

Result

Expand All

abdominal CT scan

may visualize transition zone, mass, tumor, appendicitis

  • CT scan of the abdomen is the initial imaging investigation in patients with suspected intestinal obstruction.[17] The sensitivity of abdominal CT scan in detecting intestinal obstruction is 84% to 95%, depending on the degree of obstruction.[20] CT scan has a high (approximately 90%) accuracy in predicting intestinal strangulation and therefore the need for urgent surgery.[21]

  • CT is useful in diagnosing complications of small bowel obstruction (SBO), including ischemia, strangulation, or necrosis.[16] [20] [21] [22] It can also detect underlying malignancy as a cause of SBO.[9]

  • A multidetector CT scanner and multiplanar reconstruction can be used, if available. They aid in the diagnosis and localization of the SBO.[1] [23]

may visualize transition zone, mass, tumor, appendicitis

CBC

increased WBC, rarely decreased hematocrit

  • May indicate potential severe intestinal obstruction with necrosis.

  • A low hematocrit may indicate blood loss caused by an underlying disease.

increased WBC, rarely decreased hematocrit

BUN

increased in the setting of volume depletion

  • An increase in the urea shows the severity of dehydration/renal failure in complicated small bowel obstruction.

increased in the setting of volume depletion

electrolyte panel

may show hyponatremia, hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis, and metabolic acidosis

  • Electrolyte imbalance is consistent with dehydration.

may show hyponatremia, hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis, and metabolic acidosis

Other Tests to consider

Result

Expand All

abdominal x-rays

may be normal; may show air-fluid levels, dilated intestinal loops, absence of gas in the rectum (in complete SBO), pneumoperitoneum

  • Abdominal x-rays may be considered in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected intestinal obstruction, particularly in patients who are hemodynamically unstable or unable to undergo cross-sectional imaging, or who have equivocal clinical findings. Studies testing the sensitivity of abdominal x-rays for detecting small bowel obstruction (SBO) have shown widely divergent results.[19] In addition, they likely will not give information about the etiology of obstruction, and findings may be normal in patients with early or proximal obstruction.[17] As such, they could prolong the evaluation period.[19] Upright and supine x-rays of the abdomen help to determine whether the patient has a partial or complete SBO, and whether obstruction is simple or complicated:[1]

  • Partial SBO: gas throughout the abdomen and into the rectum.

  • Complete SBO: no distal gas, and staggered air-fluid levels.

  • Complicated SBO: free air under the diaphragm suggestive of perforation; thumb-printing of the bowel suggestive of ischemia.

may be normal; may show air-fluid levels, dilated intestinal loops, absence of gas in the rectum (in complete SBO), pneumoperitoneum

water-soluble contrast study

presence or absence of contrast in the colon on abdominal x-ray

  • In patients with acute small bowel obstruction (SBO) as a result of adhesions, water-soluble contrast challenge may help estimate whether conservative treatment has been successful. Patients in which the contrast reaches the colon by 24 hours rarely require surgery.[19] [24] [25]

  • Involves the administration of water-soluble contrast material into the stomach. The subsequent assessment of the degree of passage of this material, using serial x-rays, can provide information regarding the presence and location of the obstruction within the gastrointestinal tract:

  • In partial SBO, the medium passes into rectum.

  • In complete SBO, the medium does not pass into rectum and is held up at the site of obstruction.

  • Also demonstrates the extent of disease in patients with Crohn disease.

presence or absence of contrast in the colon on abdominal x-ray

laparotomy/laparoscopy

appendicitis, malrotation, tumor mass

  • May be performed for patients in whom it is difficult to distinguish between simple and complicated small bowel obstruction (SBO), or between SBO and some other cause of abdominal pain.

appendicitis, malrotation, tumor mass

abdominal ultrasound

may show a mass, or inflamed/perforated appendix

  • This test is rarely performed in adult patients with small bowel obstruction unless the diagnosis of underlying abdominal mass or appendicitis is suspected, and CT scanning is not available or cannot be performed. The dilated loops of bowel filled with gas and fluid invariably obscure any useful detail that may be obtained by ultrasound. However, it is a useful diagnostic modality in children.

may show a mass, or inflamed/perforated appendix

abdominal MRI

may show transition zone at point of obstruction, mass

  • This test is rarely performed in patients with acute small bowel obstruction. Can be useful in chronic, recurrent, or subacute cases, such as in Crohn disease or in pregnant women, to aid diagnosis while avoiding ionizing radiation.

may show transition zone at point of obstruction, mass

Differential Diagnosis

Disease/Condition
  • Ileus

    Differentiating Signs/Symptoms

    • Less crampy abdominal pain; often associated with another cause (e.g., postoperative, systemic infection, drugs).

    Differentiating Tests

    • CT scan shows passage of contrast throughout the small bowel and into the large bowel. No transition point identified.

  • Infectious gastroenteritis

    Differentiating Signs/Symptoms

    • Vomiting, typically nonbilious.

    Differentiating Tests

    • X-ray shows gas throughout abdomen; stool cultures may be positive for viruses or bacteria.

  • Large bowel obstruction

    Differentiating Signs/Symptoms

    • Very distended abdomen; constipation progressing to absolute constipation.

    Differentiating Tests

    • CT may visualize obstruction, perforation, dilation, ischemia, malignancy.

  • Intestinal pseudo-obstruction

    Differentiating Signs/Symptoms

    • Chronic condition; constipation; often associated with administration of neurologic drugs (e.g., amitriptyline, imipramine). Rarely, clozapine has been associated with pseudo-obstruction.[28]

    Differentiating Tests

    • X-ray and CT may show dilated small or large bowel, which may be massively dilated.

  • Appendicitis

    Differentiating Signs/Symptoms

    • Pain in right lower quadrant with nausea; vomiting (nonbilious).

    Differentiating Tests

    • Ultrasound and CT may confirm diagnosis in most cases.

  • Pancreatitis

    Differentiating Signs/Symptoms

    • Continuous upper abdominal pain radiating through to the back; nonbilious vomiting.

    Differentiating Tests

    • Increased amylase and lipase; CT scan shows inflamed pancreas.

Treatment Approach

Be aware that small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a medical emergency. Diagnosis requires immediate resuscitation and management strategies vary depending on the cause. Adhesive or Crohn disease obstruction may resolve nonoperatively, while obstruction due to hernia usually requires reduction of the hernia and/or repair, and urgent surgery is indicated when there is suspected bowel ischemia or complicated SBO.
In general:
  • Patients with peritonitis or suspicion for bowel ischemia require emergency surgery.

  • Patients with simple, adhesive SBO may benefit from nasogastric decompression and close observation. Surgery will likely be required if the patient does not improve with nonoperative management after 48-72 hours.

Patients should initially be treated in the emergency room with fluid resuscitation, bowel decompression, and administration of analgesia. Early surgical consultation with a general surgeon should take place. Operative treatment is indicated in patients with complicated SBO, peritonitis, evidence of strangulation, and those who do not improve with nonoperative treatment.
Correction of the underlying cause will be required for treatment of the concomitant intestinal obstruction.

All patients

Nonoperative treatment
  • Fluid resuscitation: placement of intravenous lines and administration of intravenous fluids (either Ringer lactate or normal saline) is indicated in all patients. Monitor urine output.

  • Bowel decompression: the placement of a nasogastric tube is indicated to decompress air/fluid in the upper gastrointestinal tract, although there is evidence to suggest it may not be needed in all patients.[30] [31] A surgical consultation (general surgeon) is indicated at this stage.

  • Antiemetics: although patients with complete SBO often have severe nausea, antiemetics are generally not administered as they do not provide significant relief. The most effective antiemetic strategy is nasogastric decompression. For partial SBO an antiemetic may be beneficial, but only if nasogastric aspirates are minimal.[32] Metoclopramide is contraindicated in patients with bowel obstruction.

  • Analgesia: it is essential to provide adequate analgesia in patients with partial or complete SBO. This can be readily accomplished with opioids.

  • Antibiotics: there is insufficient evidence that broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely beneficial in these patients. However, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated if surgery is needed and is usually continued for up to 24 hours postoperatively.

The administration of intravenous fluids and passage of a nasogastric tube result in the correction of adhesive SBO in approximately 70% to 90% of cases. A water-soluble contrast challenge may be used to help estimate whether conservative treatment has been successful in these patients. If the contrast reaches the colon by 24 hours the patient rarely requires surgery.[19] [25] There is no evidence that the use of oral water-soluble contrast reduces the need for surgical intervention in patients with adhesive SBO.[33] [34] In patients with Crohn disease, medical management of the inflammatory process may be beneficial. However, if there is evidence of bowel strangulation, prompt surgical intervention is crucial. The optimal duration of nonoperative therapy is not completely defined but expert opinion suggests a 72 hour window is safe, unless there are signs and symptoms of developing bowel ischemia.[1] [21]
Correction of the underlying cause will be required for treatment of the concomitant intestinal obstruction. Appropriate specific treatment, such as Ladd procedure for malrotation, hernia repair, tumor resection, or appendectomy, should be performed. The most frequent causes include adhesions, inguinal hernia, or tumor in adults in whom no previous surgery is present.
If surgery is required, laparoscopic adhesiolysis is more favorable than an open laparotomy but may require specific surgical expertise.[16] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses found that the morbidity, mortality, infection rates, and hospital stay were all more favorable in the laparoscopic group when compared with an open laparotomy.[35] [36] [37] Laparoscopic adhesiolysis is associated with similar short-term outcomes (postoperative mortality, iatrogenic bowel perforations, length of postoperative stay, severe postoperative complications, and early readmission) as open surgery.[38]
In patients with SBO as a result of stricturing secondary to Crohn disease, endoscopic balloon dilation and double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted dilation are safe and effective alternatives to surgery.[39] [40] [41] ​Where SBO has resulted from advanced malignancy, the benefits of surgery must be weighed up against the risk of complications and increased morbidity.[42]​ Such patients may benefit more from palliation of their symptoms through conservative treatment to decompress the bowel if possible, combined with antiemetics, antispasmodics, and adequate analgesia.[16] Nonetheless, surgery may be a necessary part of the palliative treatment to manage the patient's symptoms.[9] [43]

Patients with complicated SBO, peritonitis, strangulation, or failed nonoperative treatment

Operative treatment
  • The nature of the obstruction determines the type and extent of surgery. An exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy should be performed in any patient with documented peritonitis or evidence of strangulation; and in patients with SBO who do not improve within 48-72 hours of nonoperative treatment as manifest by persistent abdominal pain, leukocytosis, evidence of ongoing obstruction with water-soluble contrast imaging, or in an inconsolable infant with documented malrotation. In complicated SBO, peritonitis is usually present (rebound, guarding), which mandates immediate resuscitation and prompt surgical intervention.[1]

Antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Patients undergoing surgery for SBO will require broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., cefotetan or cefazolin plus metronidazole) as prophylaxis for wound infection.[44]

View treatment guideline references

Treatment Options

  • acute
    Expand All
    • complicated or strangulated SBO: surgical candidate

        • 1st

          emergency surgery plus fluid resuscitation

          Comments

          • In patients with complicated or strangulated small bowel obstruction, peritonitis is usually present, which mandates immediate resuscitation and prompt surgical intervention by exploratory laparoscopy or laparotomy.

          • Placement of intravenous lines and administration of intravenous fluid (either Ringer lactate or normal saline) is indicated. Monitor urine output.

        • plus

          preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis

          Primary Options

            • cefazolin

              children ≥1 year of age: 30 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 4 hours during surgery, maximum 2000 mg/dose; adults <120 kg body weight: 2000 mg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 4 hours during surgery; adults ≥120 kg body weight: 3000 mg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 4 hours during surgery

              or

            • cefotetan

              children ≥1 year of age: 40 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 6 hours during surgery, maximum 2000 mg/dose; adults: 2000 mg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 6 hours during surgery

              AND

            • metronidazole

              children ≥1 year of age: 15 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, maximum 500 mg/dose; adults: 500 mg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery

          Comments

          • Broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., cefazolin or cefotetan plus metronidazole) are indicated preoperatively as prophylaxis for wound infection.[44]

          • Usually antibiotics are administered for up to 24 hours after surgery.

        • plus

          preoperative nasogastric decompression

          Comments

          • The placement of a nasogastric tube to decompress air/fluid in the upper gastrointestinal tract is indicated as part of initial supportive care for patients with small bowel obstruction. It is also a very effective antiemetic strategy.

        • plus

          analgesia

          Primary Options

            • morphine sulfate

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously every 2-6 hours when required, adjust dose according to response; adults: 0.8 to 10 mg/hour intravenous infusion, adjust dose according to response

            • hydromorphone

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 0.2 to 1 mg intravenously every 2-3 hours when required, adjust dose according to response

            • fentanyl

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 50-100 micrograms intravenously every 1-2 hours when required; adults: 0.5 to 1.5 micrograms/kg/hour intravenous infusion

          Comments

          • It is essential to provide adequate analgesia in these patients. This can be readily accomplished with the administration of intravenous opioids (e.g., morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl).

        • plus

          correction of the underlying cause

          Comments

          • Correction of the underlying cause will be required for treatment of the concomitant intestinal obstruction.

          • Appropriate specific treatment, such as Ladd procedure for malrotation (infants), hernia repair, tumor resection, or appendectomy, should be performed. In patients with unresectable tumors, surgery also may be a necessary part of palliative treatment.[9]​[43]

          • The most frequent causes include adhesions, inguinal hernia, or tumor in adults in whom there is no history of previous surgery.

    • complicated or strangulated SBO: surgery not indicated

        • 1st

          nasogastric decompression plus fluid resuscitation

          Comments

          • In cases where surgery is deemed not to be in the patient's best interests, the focus of treatment should be on palliation of symptoms.[16] Placement of a nasogastric tube is indicated to decompress air/fluid in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

          • Placement of intravenous lines and administration of sufficient volume of intravenous fluid (either Ringer lactate or normal saline) to resuscitate and maintain hydration is indicated. Monitor urine output.

        • plus

          analgesia

          Primary Options

            • morphine sulfate

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously every 2-6 hours when required, adjust dose according to response; adults: 0.8 to 10 mg/hour intravenous infusion, adjust dose according to response

            • hydromorphone

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 0.2 to 1 mg intravenously every 2-3 hours when required, adjust dose according to response

            • fentanyl

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 50-100 micrograms intravenously every 1-2 hours when required; adults: 0.5 to 1.5 micrograms/kg/hour intravenous infusion

          Comments

          • Adequate analgesia should be provided to all patients. This can be readily accomplished with the administration of intravenous opioids (e.g., morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl).

        • adjunct

          antiemetic

          Primary Options

            • ondansetron

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 4-8 mg intravenously every 4-8 hours when required

          Comments

          • Antiemetics (e.g., ondansetron) can be a useful adjunct to nasogastric decompression for patients with emesis and/or nausea in cases where surgery is not indicated. Metoclopramide is contraindicated in patients with bowel obstruction.

        • adjunct

          antispasmodic

          Comments

          • An antispasmodic can be used to reduce abdominal pain or discomfort as part of the management of malignant bowel obstruction.[60] [61] [62]

    • simple SBO

        • 1st

          fluid resuscitation plus nasogastric decompression

          Comments

          • Typically, conservative therapy may be adopted for 48-72 hours in cases of partial small bowel obstruction (SBO) before surgery is performed, except in patients with evidence of complicated SBO (e.g., peritonitis or bowel strangulation/ischemia), where prompt surgical intervention is crucial.[1]

          • Placement of intravenous lines and administration of large volumes of intravenous fluid (either Ringer lactate or normal saline) is indicated in all patients. Monitor urine output.

          • The placement of a nasogastric tube is indicated to decompress air/fluid in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

          • A surgical consultation (general surgeon) is indicated at this stage to determine the best course of treatment.

          • Fluid replacement and passage of a nasogastric tube result in the correction of simple adhesive SBO in approximately 70% to 90% of cases. In patients with acute SBO as a result of adhesions, a water-soluble contrast challenge may be used to help estimate whether conservative treatment has been successful. Patients in which the contrast reaches the colon by 24 hours rarely require surgery.[19] [25] There is no evidence that the use of oral water-soluble contrast reduces the need for surgical intervention in patients with adhesive SBO.[33] [34]

        • plus

          correction of the underlying cause

          Comments

          • Correction of the underlying cause will be required for treatment of the concomitant intestinal obstruction. Appropriate specific treatment, such as Ladd procedure for malrotation (infants), hernia repair, tumor resection, or appendectomy, should be performed. In patients with unresectable tumors, surgery or conservative measures may be a necessary part of palliative treatment.[9]​[43]

          • In patients with small bowel obstruction (SBO) as a result of stricturing secondary to Crohn disease, endoscopic balloon dilation and double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted dilation are safe and effective alternatives to surgery.[39] [40] [41]

          • There is no evidence that the use of oral water-soluble contrast reduces the need for surgical intervention in patients with adhesive SBO.[33] [34]

        • plus

          analgesia

          Primary Options

            • morphine sulfate

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously every 2-6 hours when required, adjust dose according to response; adults: 0.8 to 10 mg/hour intravenous infusion, adjust dose according to response

            • hydromorphone

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 0.2 to 1 mg intravenously every 2-3 hours when required, adjust dose according to response

            • fentanyl

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 50-100 micrograms intravenously every 1-2 hours when required; adults: 0.5 to 1.5 micrograms/kg/hour intravenous infusion

          Comments

          • Adequate analgesia should be provided to all patients. This can be readily accomplished with intravenous administration of opioids (e.g., morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl).

        • adjunct

          antiemetic

          Primary Options

            • ondansetron

              children: consult specialist for guidance on dose; adults: 4-8 mg intravenously every 4-8 hours when required

          Comments

          • For partial small bowel obstruction an antiemetic (e.g., ondansetron) may be beneficial, but only if nasogastric aspirates are minimal.[32]

          • Metoclopramide is contraindicated in patients with bowel obstruction.

      • not clinically improving after 48 to 72 hours

        • plus

          surgery

          Comments

          • An exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy should be performed in patients who do not improve after 48-72 hours of nonoperative treatment or sooner if there are signs and symptoms of developing bowel ischemia as manifest by persistent abdominal pain, leukocytosis, or evidence of ongoing obstruction with water-soluble contrast imaging, or in an inconsolable infant with documented malrotation.

          • In patients with small bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions, laparoscopic adhesiolysis is more favorable than an open laparotomy.[16] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses found that the morbidity, mortality, infection rates, and hospital stay were all more favorable in the laparoscopic group when compared with an open laparotomy.[35] [36] [37]​ Laparoscopic adhesiolysis is associated with similar short-term outcomes (postoperative mortality, iatrogenic bowel perforations, length of postoperative stay, severe postoperative complications, and early readmission) as open surgery.[38]

        • plus

          preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis

          Primary Options

            • cefazolin

              children ≥1 year of age: 30 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 4 hours during surgery, maximum 2000 mg/dose; adults <120 kg body weight: 2000 mg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 4 hours during surgery; adults ≥120 kg body weight: 3000 mg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 4 hours during surgery

              or

            • cefotetan

              children ≥1 year of age: 40 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 6 hours during surgery, maximum 2000 mg/dose; adults: 2000 mg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, may repeat dose every 6 hours during surgery

              AND

            • metronidazole

              children ≥1 year of age: 15 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery, maximum 500 mg/dose; adults: 500 mg intravenously as a single dose within 60 minutes of surgery

          Comments

          • Broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., cefazolin or cefotetan plus metronidazole) are indicated preoperatively as prophylaxis for wound infection.[44]

          • Usually antibiotics are administered for up to 24 hours after surgery.

Prevention

Primary Prevention

Although there is no reliable strategy to prevent the occurrence of intra-abdominal adhesions (the most common cause of small bowel obstruction [SBO]) after abdominal surgery, best surgical practice may minimize their formation.[12] There are also a variety of agents designed to limit the extent of adhesion formation, although their efficacy remains controversial.[13] One of the potential advantages of laparoscopic surgery compared with open colorectal surgery is a reduction in postoperative bowel obstruction events. A meta-analysis showed that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease reduces overall early postoperative bowel obstruction, including ileus, as well as early bowel obstruction in subgroups of patients having surgery for cancer and diverticular disease.[6]
The diagnosis and correction of malrotation can significantly prevent the development of SBO due to intestinal volvulus.[14] Treatment of Crohn disease and surgical correction of hernias can also limit its development.

Follow-Up Overview

Prognosis

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a medical emergency. Patients treated in a timely manner have a very good prognosis. In untreated patients, obstruction could progress to intestinal necrosis, perforation, sepsis, and multi-organ failure.
  • Patients with previous surgery are most likely to have intestinal adhesions as a cause of the SBO. Such patients are at risk of recurrent SBO due to the formation of recurrent adhesions despite adequate adhesiolysis.

  • Patients without prior surgery may have an underlying malignancy, inguinal hernia, congenital band, or Crohn disease as the cause of the obstruction, and their outcome will be determined by the response to the underlying condition.

Monitoring

After surgery, patients should be monitored for recurrence of their symptoms (e.g., crampy pain, abdominal distention, vomiting).
Following discharge, patients should be seen annually for routine medical care by their primary care physician. Evidence of crampy abdominal pain or food intolerance should lead to additional investigations by an upper gastrointestinal x-ray with small bowel follow-through and/or a computed tomographic scan of the abdomen, to assess for disease recurrence, particularly in the setting of malignancy. The frequency of follow-up and monitoring should be determined by the underlying disease.

Complications

Medium Likelihood

Timeframe

Expand All

intestinal necrosis

short term

  • As obstruction progresses, intestinal perfusion may decrease, resulting in ischemic change and necrosis. This is heralded by the onset of peritonitis, leukocytosis, dehydration, and prerenal acute kidney injury.[22] [64] [65]

short term

sepsis

short term

  • Patients who develop intestinal necrosis are at risk of developing intestinal perforation with sepsis and multi-organ failure. This leads to death in many patients.

short term

multi-organ failure

short term

  • Patients who develop intestinal necrosis are at risk of developing intestinal perforation with sepsis and multi-organ failure. This leads to death in many patients.

short term

intestinal perforation

variable

  • Patients who develop intestinal necrosis are at risk of developing intestinal perforation with sepsis and multi-organ failure. This leads to death in many patients.

variable

Low Likelihood

Timeframe

Expand All

intra-abdominal abscess

short term

  • In cases of intestinal obstruction with perforation, patients may develop intra-abdominal infection with abscess formation. This requires treatment by either open surgery or image-guided drainage.

short term

short bowel syndrome

long term

  • If correction of the small bowel obstruction requires resection of a large amount of small intestine, patients may develop short bowel syndrome. This condition is characterized by the functional or anatomic loss of extensive segments of the small intestine resulting in inadequate absorption of enteral nutrition.

  • These patients require supplemental nutrition, either via the enteral or the parenteral route. Definitive treatment involves intestinal transplantation in severe cases.

long term

Citations

    Key Articles

    • Maung AA, Johnson DC, Piper GL, et al; Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5 suppl 4):S362-9.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • Jackson P, Vigiola Cruz M. Intestinal obstruction: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2018 Sep 15;98(6):362-7.[Abstract]

    • American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: suspected small-bowel obstruction. 2019 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • Ten Broek RPG, Krielen P, Di Saverio S, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the World Society of Emergency Surgery ASBO Working Group. World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jun 19;13:24.[Abstract][Full Text]

    Referenced Articles

    • 1. Maung AA, Johnson DC, Piper GL, et al; Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5 suppl 4):S362-9.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 2. Hill AG. The management of adhesive small bowel obstruction - an update. Int J Surg. 2008 Feb;6(1):77-80.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 3. Jeong WK, Lim SB, Choi HS, et al. Conservative management of adhesive small bowel obstructions in patients previously operated on for primary colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 May;12(5):926-32.[Abstract]

    • 4. Attard JA, MacLean AR. Adhesive small bowel obstruction: epidemiology, biology and prevention. Can J Surg. 2007 Aug;50(4):291-300.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 5. Tsao KJ, St Peter SD, Valusek PA, et al. Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children: comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Jun;42(6):939-42.[Abstract]

    • 6. Yamada T, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, et al. Meta-analysis of the risk of small bowel obstruction following open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):493-503.[Abstract]

    • 7. Ha GW, Lee MR, Kim JH. Adhesive small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2016 Sep;212(3):527-36.[Abstract]

    • 8. Pecorelli N, Greco M, Amodeo S, et al. Small bowel obstruction and incisional hernia after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative trials. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):85-99.[Abstract]

    • 9. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: small bowel adenocarcinoma. 2025 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 10. Negoi I, Paun S, Hostiuc S, et al. Most small bowel cancers are revealed by a complication. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015 Oct-Dec;13(4):500-5.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 11. Malý O, Páral J. Appendicitis as a rare cause of mechanical small-bowel obstruction: a literature review of case reports. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;29:180-4.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 12. Brüggmann D, Tchartchian G, Wallwiener M, et al. Intra-abdominal adhesions: definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Nov;107(44):769-75.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 13. Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ. Intra-peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non-gynaecological abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD005080.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 14. Petrovic B, Nikolaidis P, Hammond NA, et al. Identification of adhesions on CT in small-bowel obstruction. Emerg Radiol. 2006 Mar;12(3):88-93.[Abstract]

    • 15. Taylor MR, Lalani N. Adult small bowel obstruction. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;20(6):528-44.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 16. Rami Reddy SR, Cappell MS. A systematic review of the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of small bowel obstruction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Jun;19(6):28.[Abstract]

    • 17. Jackson P, Vigiola Cruz M. Intestinal obstruction: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2018 Sep 15;98(6):362-7.[Abstract]

    • 18. Breum BM, Rud B, Kirkegaard T, et al. Accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 14;21(34):10018-24.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 19. American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: suspected small-bowel obstruction. 2019 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 20. Li Z, Zhang L, Liu X, et al. Diagnostic utility of CT for small bowel obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):e0226740.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 21. Ten Broek RPG, Krielen P, Di Saverio S, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the World Society of Emergency Surgery ASBO Working Group. World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jun 19;13:24.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 22. Millet I, Taourel P, Ruyer A, et al. Value of CT findings to predict surgical ischemia in small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2015 Jun;25(6):1823-35.[Abstract]

    • 23. Zhou J, Cong R, Shi J, et al. Diagnostic significance of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with small bowel obstruction: a meta-analysis. Jpn J Radiol. 2020 May;38(5):458-62.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 24. Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnüriger B, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2010 Apr;97(4):470-8.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 25. Ceresoli M, Coccolini F, Catena F, et al. Water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic value. Am J Surg. 2016 Jun;211(6):1114-25.[Abstract]

    • 26. Simundic AM, Bölenius K, Cadamuro J, et al. Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI recommendation for venous blood sampling. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(12):2015-38.[Abstract]

    • 27. Sajja SB, Schein M. Early postoperative small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2004 Jun;91(6):683-91.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 28. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Clozapine: reminder of potentially fatal risk of intestinal obstruction, faecal impaction, and paralytic ileus. Oct 2017 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 29. American College of Radiology; Society for Pediatric Radiology. ACR-SPR practice parameter for the performance of a contrast small bowel examination. 2023 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 30. Klingbeil KD, Wu JX, Osuna-Garcia A, et al. Management of small bowel obstruction and systematic review of treatment without nasogastric tube decompression. Surg Open Sci. 2022 Nov 7;12:62-7.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 31. Fonseca AL, Schuster KM, Maung AA, et al. Routine nasogastric decompression in small bowel obstruction: is it really necessary? Am Surg. 2013 Apr;79(4):422-8.[Abstract]

    • 32. Chen SC, Lee CC, Yen ZS, et al. Specific oral medications decrease the need for surgery in adhesive partial small-bowel obstruction. Surgery. 2006 Mar;139(3):312-6.[Abstract]

    • 33. Koh A, Adiamah A, Chowdhury A, et al. Therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast media in adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Feb;24(2):473-83.[Abstract]

    • 34. Scotté M, Mauvais F, Bubenheim M, et al. Use of water-soluble contrast medium (gastrografin) does not decrease the need for operative intervention nor the duration of hospital stay in uncomplicated acute adhesive small bowel obstruction? a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (adhesive small bowel obstruction study) and systematic review. Surgery. 2017 May;161(5):1315-25.[Abstract]

    • 35. Sajid MS, Khawaja AH, Sains P, et al. A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 2016 Jul;212(1):138-50.[Abstract]

    • 36. Wiggins T, Markar SR, Harris A. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3432-42.[Abstract]

    • 37. Quah GS, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for adhesional small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3209-17.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 38. Krielen P, Di Saverio S, Ten Broek R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open approach for adhesive small bowel obstruction, a systematic review and meta-analysis of short term outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jun;88(6):866-74.[Abstract]

    • 39. Navaneethan U, Lourdusamy V, Njei B, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation in the management of strictures in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized trials. Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5434-43.[Abstract]

    • 40. Baars JE, Theyventhiran R, Aepli P, et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted dilatation avoids surgery for small bowel strictures: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 7;23(45):8073-81.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 41. Bettenworth D, Bokemeyer A, Kou L, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy of balloon-assisted enteroscopy for dilation of small bowel Crohn's disease strictures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Oct;52(7):1104-16.[Abstract]

    • 42. Cousins SE, Tempest E, Feuer DJ. Surgery for the resolution of symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 4;(1):CD002764.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 43. Santangelo ML, Grifasi C, Criscitiello C, et al. Bowel obstruction and peritoneal carcinomatosis in the elderly: a systematic review. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Feb;29(Suppl 1):73-8.[Abstract]

    • 44. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Feb;14(1):73-156.[Full Text]

    • 45. Kusminsky RE. Complications of central venous catheterization. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):681-96.[Abstract]

    • 46. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1123-33.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 47. Smith RN, Nolan JP. Central venous catheters. BMJ. 2013 Nov 11;347:f6570.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 48. Reich DL. Monitoring in anesthesia and perioperative care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

    • 49. Abbott Northwestern Hospital Internal Medicine Residency. Internal jugular central venous line. 2022 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 50. Bishop L, Dougherty L, Bodenham A, et al. Guidelines on the insertion and management of central venous access devices in adults. Int J Lab Hematol. 2007 Aug;29(4):261-78.[Abstract]

    • 51. Practice guidelines for central venous access 2020: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access. Anesthesiology. 2020 Jan;132(1):8-43.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 52. Fletcher SJ, Bodenham AR. Safe placement of central venous catheters: where should the tip of the catheter lie? Br J Anaesth. 2000 Aug;85(2):188-91.[Abstract]

    • 53. Gibson F, Bodenham A. Misplaced central venous catheters: applied anatomy and practical management. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):333-46.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 54. Schuster M, Nave H, Piepenbrock S, et al. The carina as a landmark in central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Aug;85(2):192-4.[Abstract]

    • 55. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, et al. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 23;(1):CD007798.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 56. Royal College of Nursing. Catheter care: RCN guidance for health care professionals. Jul 2021 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 57. Royal College of Nursing. Catheter care: guidance for health care professionals. Jul 2021 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 58. NHS Improvement. Patient Safety review and response: April to September 2018. March 2019 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 59. NHS England. Patient safety alert on placement devices for nasogastric tube insertion. December 2019 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 60. Roeland E, von Gunten CF. Current concepts in malignant bowel obstruction management. Curr Oncol Rep. 2009 Jul;11(4):298-303.[Abstract]

    • 61. Ripamonti CI, Easson AM, Gerdes H. Management of malignant bowel obstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2008 May;44(8):1105-15.[Abstract]

    • 62. Madariaga A, Lau J, Ghoshal A, et al. MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun;30(6):4711-28.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 63. Canadian Association of General Surgeons. Dynamic practice guidelines for emergency general surgery: small bowel obstruction. 2018 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 64. Chai Y, Xing J, Lv P, et al. Evaluation of ischemia and necrosis in adhesive small bowel obstruction based on CT signs: subjective visual evaluation and objective measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2022 Feb;147:110115.[Abstract]

    • 65. Yang TWW, Prabhakaran S, Bell S, et al. Non-operative management for small bowel obstruction in a virgin abdomen: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2021 May;91(5):802-9.[Abstract]

Guidelines

Diagnostic

  • ACR-SPR practice parameter for the performance of a contrast small bowel examination[29]

    Summary

    These guidelines are designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate radiologic care for patients.

    Published by

    American College of Radiology; Society for Pediatric Radiology

    Published

    2023

  • ACR appropriateness criteria: suspected small-bowel obstruction[19]

    Summary

    These guidelines provide recommendations on the selection of appropriate radiologic imaging procedures for evaluation of patients with suspected small bowel obstruction.

    Published by

    American College of Radiology

    Published

    2019

  • Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction[1]

    Summary

    Consensus guidelines addressing the evaluation of small bowel obstruction (SBO).
    Computed tomographic scan of abdomen and pelvis should be considered in all patients with SBO, as it can provide incremental information over plain films in differentiating grade, severity, and etiology of SBOs that may lead to changes in management.

    Published by

    Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

    Published

    2012

  • Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update[21]

    Summary

    Includes an algorithm for the diagnosis of adhesive small bowel obstruction.

    Published by

    World Society of Emergency Surgery

    Published

    2018

Treatment

  • Dynamic practice guidelines for emergency general surgery: small bowel obstruction[63]

    Summary

    Recommendations for the management of small bowel obstruction.

    Published by

    Canadian Association of General Surgeons

    Published

    2018

  • Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction[1]

    Summary

    Consensus guidelines for the management of small bowel obstruction.

    Published by

    Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

    Published

    2012

  • Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update[21]

    Summary

    In the absence of signs that require urgent surgical exploration (i.e., peritonitis, strangulation, or bowel ischemia), nonoperative management is the treatment strategy of choice for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

    Published by

    World Society of Emergency Surgery

    Published

    2018

Credits

Authors

Topic last updated: 2025-08-15

Adrian Maung, MD, MBA, FACS, FCCM

Associate Professor of Surgery

Division of General Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery

Yale School of Medicine

New Haven

CT

[disclosures]

Acknowledgements:

Dr Adrian Maung would like to gratefully acknowledge Dr John T. Jenkins, Dr Edward T. Pring, Dr George Malietzis, Dr Frances J. McNicol, and Dr David J. Hackam, previous contributors to this topic.

[disclosures]

Peer Reviewers

Steven D. Wexner, MD, FACS, FRCS, FRCS (Ed)

Chief Academic Officer

Emeritus Chief of Staff (1997-2007)

Chairman Department of Colorectal Surgery

Professor of Surgery Ohio State University

Affiliate Professor Department of Surgery

Division of General Surgery

University of South Florida College of Medicine

Cleveland Clinic Florida

FL

[disclosures]

Patient Instructions

Patients should be advised to seek medical attention for symptoms suggestive of recurrent intestinal obstruction (e.g., crampy pain, abdominal distention, and vomiting), particularly if there is evidence of prior intestinal necrosis.
Have feedback?
Tell us about your experience
Scroll to Top
Download Epocrates from the App StoreDownload Epocrates from the Play Store
About UsFeaturesBusiness SolutionsHelp & Feedback
© 2026 epocrates, Inc.   Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyEditorial PolicyDo Not Sell or Share My Information