epocrates logo
epocrates logo
epocrates logo
  • 0

Diseases

Evaluation of recurrent miscarriage

OVERVIEW

  • Summary
  • Urgent Considerations
  • Etiology

DIAGNOSIS

  • Differential Diagnosis
  • Diagnostic Approach

IMAGES

  • Library

REFERENCES

  • Citations
  • Credits

Summary

AAFont SizeShareMore Information
Recurrent miscarriage is defined by the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine as 2 or more failed clinical pregnancies (i.e., documented by ultrasound or histopathology).[1] [2]​ It affects about 1% of all fertile couples trying to conceive, in comparison with sporadic nonconsecutive miscarriages, which occur in about 15% to 20% of all pregnancies.[3] [4]​ A miscarriage includes any pregnancy that ends before the age of viability, which currently stands at 24 weeks' gestation. A miscarriage that occurs before 12 weeks' gestation is commonly termed an early or first-trimester miscarriage, and one that occurs between 13 and 24 weeks' gestation is known as a late or second-trimester miscarriage.
Evaluation can start after 2 or 3 consecutive miscarriages, as prevalence of causes is similar in those with 2, 3, or more miscarriages.[5] [6]​ Despite a wide range of investigations, no apparent cause is found in >50% of cases of recurrent miscarriage.[7] About 70% of patients with no cause found will achieve a live birth in the subsequent pregnancy depending on the age of the woman and the number of previous miscarriages.[5] [7]
Predicted percentage success rate of subsequent pregnancy according to age and previous miscarriage
Predicted percentage success rate of subsequent pregnancy according to age and previous miscarriage history
Created by the BMJ Group; data from Brigham SA, et al. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2868-2871
Definite associations of recurrent miscarriage include chromosomal abnormalities, antiphospholipid syndrome, certain structural uterine abnormalities such as septate uterus, and certain thrombophilias. However, a reduction in risk of miscarriage in a subsequent pregnancy following treatment has not been proven unequivocally for most of these conditions. Controversy surrounds the possible association of other conditions with recurrent miscarriage, including immunologic factors, other uterine abnormalities (e.g., cervical insufficiency), infection, and male and endocrinologic factors. There is a need for high-quality and methodologically sound research to guide management of these patients.[8]

Risk factors

Increasing maternal age reduces the chance of a successful live birth. Women ages 20 years with 2 previous miscarriages have a 92% chance of success in the next pregnancy compared with only a 60% chance of success in women ages 45 years with 2 previous miscarriages.[9]
Advanced paternal age also appears to be associated with greater risk for spontaneous miscarriage.[10] [11] [12] Increased frequency of chromosomal anomalies in sperm has been implicated.[13] In one systematic review and meta-analysis, risk for pregnancy loss <20 weeks was increased by 23% and 43% among men ages 40-44 and ≥45 years, respectively (compared with men ages 25-29 years).[12]
Primigravidas and patients who consistently have successful pregnancies have only about 5% risk of miscarriage, compared with 24% in patients who have previously miscarried.[14] Other studies similarly show a trend of miscarriage rate increasing with the number of previous miscarriages.[9] [15] Therefore, the risk of miscarriage is directly related to the outcome of previous pregnancies.
Recurrent miscarriage is a stressful condition, so alongside medical investigations and appropriate treatment, patient education, counseling, and support should be provided.
content by BMJ Group
Last updated

Library

  • Predicted percentage success rate of subsequent pregnancy according to age and previous miscarriage

    Predicted percentage success rate of subsequent pregnancy according to age and previous miscarriage history

  • Photomicrograph of clue cells: vaginal epithelial cells with a stippled appearance and obscured bord

    Photomicrograph of clue cells: vaginal epithelial cells with a stippled appearance and obscured borders, due to bacteria adhering to their surface

Citations

    Key Articles

    • European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Guideline on the management of recurrent pregnancy loss. Feb 2023 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1103-11. [Abstract]

    • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Recurrent miscarriage: green-top guideline no. 17. Jun 2023 [internet publication].[Abstract][Full Text]

    • Jauniaux E, Farquharson RG, Christiansen OB, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2006 Sep;21(9):2216-22. [Abstract][Full Text]

    Referenced Articles

    • 1. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Guideline on the management of recurrent pregnancy loss. Feb 2023 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 2. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1103-11. [Abstract]

    • 3. Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 1990 Sep 15;336(8716):673-5.[Abstract]

    • 4. Ng KYB, Cherian G, Kermack AJ, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of female lifestyle factors and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 29;11(1):7081.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 5. Habayeb OM, Konje JC. The one-stop recurrent miscarriage clinic: an evaluation of its effectiveness and outcome. Hum Reprod. 2004 Dec;19(12):2952-8. [Abstract][Full Text]

    • 6. Toth B, Bohlmann M, Hancke K, et al. Recurrent miscarriage: diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/050, May 2022). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Jan;83(1):49-78.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 7. Quenby SM, Farquharson RG. Predicting recurring miscarriage: what is important? Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):132-8.[Abstract]

    • 8. Hennessy M, Dennehy R, Meaney S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage in high-income countries: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Jun;42(6):1146-71.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 9. Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1999 Nov;14(11):2868-71.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 10. Kleinhaus K, Perrin M, Friedlander Y, et al. Paternal age and spontaneous abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):369-77.[Abstract]

    • 11. Nguyen BT, Chang EJ, Bendikson KA. Advanced paternal age and the risk of spontaneous abortion: an analysis of the combined 2011-2013 and 2013-2015 National Survey of Family Growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;221(5):476.e1-7.[Abstract]

    • 12. du Fossé NA, van der Hoorn MP, van Lith JMM, et al. Advanced paternal age is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Sep 1;26(5):650-69.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 13. Slama R, Bouyer J, Windham G, et al. Influence of paternal age on the risk of spontaneous abortion. Am J Epidemiol. 2005 May 1;161(9):816-23.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 14. Regan L, Braude PR, Trembath PL. Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion. BMJ. 1989 Aug 26;299(6698):541-5.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 15. Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S, et al. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2000 Feb;73(2):300-4.[Abstract]

    • 16. Hogge WA, Byrnes AL, Lanasa MC, et al. The clinical use of karyotyping spontaneous abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):397-400.[Abstract]

    • 17. Clifford K, Rai R, Watson H, et al. An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod. 1994 Jul;9(7):1328-32.[Abstract]

    • 18. Carp H, Feldman B, Oelsner G, et al. Parental karyotype and subsequent live births in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2004 May;81(5):1296-301.[Abstract]

    • 19. Stephenson MD, Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. Hum Reprod. 2006 Apr;21(4):1076-82.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 20. Pasquier E, Bohec C, De Saint Martin L, et al. Strong evidence that skewed X-chromosome inactivation is not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: an incident paired case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2007 Nov;22(11):2829-33. [Abstract]

    • 21. Beever CL, Stephenson MD, Penaherrera MS, et al. Skewed X-chromosome inactivation is associated with trisomy in women ascertained on the basis of recurrent spontaneous abortion or chromosomally abnormal pregnancies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Feb;72(2):399-407.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 22. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):761-71.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 23. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):161-74.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 24. Valli E, Vaquero E, Lazzarin N, et al. Hysteroscopic metroplasty improves gestational outcome in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 May;11(2):240-4.[Abstract]

    • 25. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hysteroscopic metroplasty of a uterine septum for recurrent miscarriage. January 2015 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 26. Drakeley AJ, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003 Jan;2003(1):CD003253.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 27. Rai RS, Regan L, Clifford K, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies and beta 2-glycoprotein-I in 500 women with recurrent miscarriage: results of a comprehensive screening approach. Hum Reprod. 1995 Aug;10(8):2001-5.[Abstract]

    • 28. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Recurrent miscarriage: green-top guideline no. 17. Jun 2023 [internet publication].[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 29. Knight JS, Branch DW, Ortel TL. Antiphospholipid syndrome: advances in diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management. BMJ. 2023 Feb 27;380:e069717.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 30. Arachchillage DJ, Platton S, Hickey K, et al. Guidelines on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2024 Sep;205(3):855-80.[Full Text]

    • 31. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Feb;4(2):295-306.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 32. Barbhaiya M, Zuily S, Naden R, et al. The 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Oct;75(10):1687-702.[Abstract]

    • 33. Cavalcante MB, da Silva PHA, Carvalho TR, et al. Peripheral blood natural killer cell cytotoxicity in recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reprod Immunol. 2023 Aug;158:103956.[Abstract]

    • 34. Von Woon E, Greer O, Shah N, et al. Number and function of uterine natural killer cells in recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2022 Jun 30;28(4):548-82.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 35. Vomstein K, Feil K, Strobel L, et al. Immunological risk factors in recurrent pregnancy loss: guidelines versus current state of the art. J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 20;10(4):869.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 36. Meuleman T, Lashley LE, Dekkers OM, et al. HLA associations and HLA sharing in recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Immunol. 2015 May;76(5):362-73.[Abstract]

    • 37. Wong LF, Porter TF, Scott JR. Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(10):CD000112.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 38. Liu X, Chen Y, Ye C, et al. Hereditary thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr 20;36(5):1213-29.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 39. Robertson L, Wu O, Langhorne P, et al; Thrombosis: risk and economic assessment of thrombophilia screening (TREATS) study. Thrombophilia in pregnancy: a systematic review. Br J Haematol. 2006 Jan;132(2):171-96.[Abstract]

    • 40. Shehata H, Ali A, Silva-Edge M, et al. Thrombophilia screening in women with recurrent first trimester miscarriage: is it time to stop testing? - a cohort study and systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e059519.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 41. Vomstein K, Herzog A, Voss P, et al. Recurrent miscarriage is not associated with a higher prevalence of inherited and acquired thrombophilia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021 Jan;85(1):e13327.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 42. Arachchillage DJ, Mackillop L, Chandratheva A, et al. Thrombophilia testing: a British Society for Haematology guideline. Br J Haematol. 2022 Aug;198(3):443-58.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 43. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 197: inherited thrombophilias in pregnancy. Jul 2018 [internet publication].[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 44. Cocksedge KA, Li TC, Saravelos SH, et al. A reappraisal of the role of polycystic ovary syndrome in recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Jul;17(1):151-60.[Abstract]

    • 45. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004 Jan;19(1):41-7.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 46. Craig LB, Ke RW, Kutteh WH. Increased prevalence of insulin resistance in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2002 Sep;78(3):487-90.[Abstract]

    • 47. Rai R, Backos M, Rushworth F, et al. Polycystic ovaries and recurrent miscarriage: a reappraisal. Hum Reprod. 2000 Mar;15(3):612-5.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 48. Arredondo F, Noble LS. Endocrinology of recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2006 Feb;24(1):33-9.[Abstract]

    • 49. Haas DM, Hathaway TJ, Ramsey PS. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 20;2019(11):CD003511.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 50. Devall AJ, Papadopoulou A, Podesek M, et al. Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD013792.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 51. Coomarasamy A, Williams H, Truchanowicz E, et al. A randomized trial of progesterone in women with recurrent miscarriages. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2141-8.[Abstract]

    • 52. Coomarasamy A, Devall AJ, Brosens JJ, et al. Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscarriage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):167-76.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 53. Dlugi AM. Hyperprolactinemic recurrent spontaneous pregnancy loss: a true clinical entity or a spurious finding? Fertil Steril. 1998 Aug;70(2):253-5.[Abstract]

    • 54. Abalovich M, Gutierrez S, Alcaraz G, et al. Overt and subclinical hypothyroidism complicating pregnancy. Thyroid. 2002 Jan;12(1):63-8.[Abstract]

    • 55. Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM. Thyroid autoimmunity and miscarriage. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004 Jun;150(6):751-5.[Abstract]

    • 56. Mills JL, Simpson JL, Driscoll SG, et al. Incidence of spontaneous abortion among normal women and insulin-dependent diabetic women whose pregnancies were identified within 21 days of conception. N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 22;319(25):1617-23.[Abstract]

    • 57. Summers PR. Microbiology relevant to recurrent miscarriage. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Sep;37(3):722-9.[Abstract]

    • 58. Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, et al. Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):295-8.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 59. Matovina M, Husnjak K, Milutin N, et al. Possible role of bacterial and viral infections in miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2004 Mar;81(3):662-9.[Abstract]

    • 60. Pirtea P, Cicinelli E, De Nola R, et al. Endometrial causes of recurrent pregnancy losses: endometriosis, adenomyosis, and chronic endometritis. Fertil Steril. 2021 Mar;115(3):546-60.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 61. Santoro A, Travaglino A, Inzani F, et al. The role of plasma cells as a marker of chronic endometritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomedicines. 2023 Jun 15;11(6):1714.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 62. Greenwood SM, Moran JJ. Chronic endometritis: morphologic and clinical observations. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Aug;58(2):176-84.[Abstract]

    • 63. Bayer-Garner IB, Korourian S. Plasma cells in chronic endometritis are easily identified when stained with syndecan-1. Mod Pathol. 2001 Sep;14(9):877-9.[Abstract]

    • 64. McQueen DB, Perfetto CO, Hazard FK, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic endometritis and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2015 Oct;104(4):927-31.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 65. Cicinelli E, Vitagliano A, Kumar A, et al. Unified diagnostic criteria for chronic endometritis at fluid hysteroscopy: proposal and reliability evaluation through an international randomized-controlled observer study. Fertil Steril. 2019 Jul;112(1):162-73.e2.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 66. McQueen DB, Zhang J, Robins JC. Sperm DNA fragmentation and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2019 Jul;112(1):54-60.e3.[Abstract]

    • 67. Yifu P, Lei Y, Shaoming L, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 26;:101740.[Abstract]

    • 68. Papas RS, Kutteh WH. A new algorithm for the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss redefining unexplained miscarriage: review of current guidelines. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;32(5):371-79. [Abstract][Full Text]

    • 69. Gardella JR, Hill JA 3rd. Environmental toxins associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):407-24.[Abstract]

    • 70. Kline J, Shrout P, Stein Z, et al. Drinking during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion. Lancet. 1980 Jul 26;2(8187):176-80.[Abstract]

    • 71. Signorello LB, McLaughlin JK. Maternal caffeine consumption and spontaneous abortion: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiology. 2004;15:229-239.[Abstract]

    • 72. Sata F, Yamada H, Suzuki K, et al. Caffeine intake, CYP1A2 polymorphism and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005 May;11(5):357-60.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 73. Brent RL. The effects of embryonic and fetal exposure to x-ray, microwaves, and ultrasound. Clin Perinatol. 1986 Sep;13(3):615-48.[Abstract]

    • 74. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management. Aug 2023 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 75. Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Rinaudo PF, et al. Symptomatic patients with an early viable intrauterine pregnancy: HCG curves redefined. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):50-5.[Abstract]

    • 76. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Green-top guideline no. 21. November 2016 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 77. Kim C, Barnard S, Neilson JP, et al. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 31;1:CD007223.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 78. Neill S, Hoe E, Fortin J, et al. Management of early pregnancy loss among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts and barriers to mifepristone use. Contraception. 2023 Oct;126:110108.[Abstract]

    • 79. Ghosh J, Papadopoulou A, Devall AJ, et al. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 80. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What is stillbirth?. Sep 2022 [internet publication].​[Full Text]

    • 81. Jauniaux E, Farquharson RG, Christiansen OB, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2006 Sep;21(9):2216-22. [Abstract][Full Text]

    • 82. Bradley LA, Palomaki GE, Bienstock J, et al. Can Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A testing in women with recurrent pregnancy loss result in improved pregnancy outcomes?: Results from a targeted evidence-based review. Genet Med. 2012 Jan;14(1):39-50.[Abstract]

    • 83. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The role of natural killer cells in human fertility. Scientific impact paper no. 53. December 2016 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 84. Foyouzi N, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. Cost-effectiveness of cytogenetic evaluation of products of conception in the patient with a second pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;98(1):151-5.[Abstract]

    • 85. Bernardi LA, Plunkett BA, Stephenson MD. Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving? A decision analysis of selective versus universal recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;98(1):156-61.[Abstract]

    • 86. Dhillon RK, Hillman SC, Morris RK, et al. Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):11-21.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 87. Ikuma S, Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and natural conception: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss associated with translocation. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129958.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 88. Audibert F, Wilson RD, Allen V, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Aug;31(8):761-75.[Abstract]

    • 89. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Genetic aspects of female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):293-307.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 90. Subtil D, Brabant G, Tilloy E, et al. Early clindamycin for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (PREMEVA): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2171-79.[Abstract]

    • 91. Brocklehurst P, Gordon A, Heatley E, et al. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD000262.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 92. Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Tinelli R, et al. Chronic endometritis due to common bacteria is prevalent in women with recurrent miscarriage as confirmed by improved pregnancy outcome after antibiotic treatment. Reprod Sci. 2014 May;21(5):640-7.[Abstract]

    • 93. Queensland Health. Queensland clinical guidelines: early pregnancy loss. 2025 [internet publication].[Full Text]

    • 94. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Sep-Oct;14(5):415-29.[Abstract]

    • 95. ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL, Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, et al. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018(2):hoy004.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 96. Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):2-7.[Abstract][Full Text]

    • 97. Crane JM, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;31(5):579-87.[Abstract]

    • 98. Farquharson RG, Jauniaux E, Exalto N, et al. Updated and revised nomenclature for description of early pregnancy events. Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3008-11.[Abstract][Full Text]

Have feedback?
Tell us about your experience
Scroll to Top
epocrates logo

Sign in to access our clinical decision support tools

Sign inCreate Account
Download Epocrates from the App StoreDownload Epocrates from the Play Store
About UsFeaturesBusiness SolutionsHelp & Feedback
© 2026 epocrates, Inc.   Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyEditorial PolicyDo Not Sell or Share My Information