epocrates logo
epocrates logo
epocrates logo
  • 0

Journal Article Synopsis

Am J Gastroenterol

Meta-analysis examines safety of IBS pharmacotherapy

June 12, 2025

card-image

Study details: This meta-analysis assessed the safety of IBS pharmacotherapies across 81 randomized controlled trials with over 22,000 patients. Researchers compared adverse event rates by drug class, focusing on number needed to harm (NNH) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included relative risk of withdrawal and common adverse events.

Results: For IBS with constipation, tenapanor had the highest risk of adverse events (NNH: 16), while linaclotide, lubiprostone, plecanatide, and tegaserod had more favorable safety profiles (NNHs ranging from 35 to 59). In IBS with diarrhea, alosetron (NNH: 14) and eluxadoline (NNH: 32) showed higher risk, whereas rifaximin and ramosetron didn't significantly increase harm. For global IBS symptoms, tricyclic antidepressants had an NNH of 24. Most adverse events were mild and short-lived, with rifaximin emerging as the safest option overall.

Clinical impact: Tricyclic antidepressants (particularly at higher doses), tenapanor, and alosetron are associated with the greatest likelihood of discontinuing therapy due to adverse events, whereas rifaximin demonstrated the most favorable safety profile among the options evaluated.

Source:

Busam JA, et al. (2025, June 5). Am J Gastroenterol. The Safety of Pharmacotherapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40471839/

Trending icon

TRENDING THIS WEEK

EPOCRATES CME

View Catalog

view all CME activities
learn more about epocrates plus
Clinical FAQ icon

Clinical FAQs

Check out the answers to frequently asked questions about our clinical content.

Download Epocrates from the App StoreDownload Epocrates from the Play Store
About UsFeaturesBusiness SolutionsHelp & Feedback
© 2026 epocrates, Inc.   Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyEditorial PolicyDo Not Sell or Share My Information